This document is a preliminary transcript (Part I) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida.
Auto-extracted from the original PDF · may contain extraction artifacts. The source document above is authoritative.
.. - ,.
19
Y authtrity of
E. c 11G
hanged by C4?1 •'o <<=
/
GEMINI V
TECHNICAL DEBRIEFING (U)
Part 1
NOTICE: This document may be exempt from
public disclosure under the Freedom of lnfor•
mation Act (5 U.S.C. 552). Requests for its re
lease to persons outside the U.S. Government
should be handled under the provisions of
NASA Policy Directive 1382.2.
THIS MATE RIAL CONTAINS INF'ORM.ATION AFl"IECTING
THE NATIONAL OEFENSE OF THE
UN I TEO STATES
WITHIN THE MEANING OF' TH£ £8P'IONAGIE LAW 5 ,.
TITLE 11. U . S.C, SECTION 793 ANO 794 .
T HE TRANS
M I SSION OR REVELAT I O N Of' WH IC H IN AN Y MANNER
TO AN UNA UTHORIZED PERSON IS PR OHIB ITED av L AW.
GROUP 4
OOWNCiftAOEO AT ) V EAR INTFRVALS,
OECLASSI F'IEO AFTER
12 VEARS
t
" 6()tJF18Er4 T I;\b
PRELIMINARY
GT- 5 FLIGHT CREW DEBRIEFING TRANSCRIPT
PART I
Prepared By
Spacecraft Operations Branch
Flight Crew Support Division
September 1 , 1965
This material contains informati on affecting the
national defense of the United States within the
meaning of the Espionage Laws , Title 18. U. S. C.
Section 793 and 794, the transmission or revela
tion of which in any manner to an unauthorized
person is prohibited by law.
Gr oup 4:
Downgrade at 3 year intervals
Declassified after 12 years
PREFACE
This preliminary transcript was made from voice tape recordings
of the GT-5 flight crew debriefing conducted August 30, 1965 thru
September 1, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy , Florida.
Although all the material contained in this transcript has been
edited, the urgent need for the preliminary transcript by mission
analysis personnel precluded a thorough editorial review prior to its
publication.
Errors in this transcript will be corrected as soon as
possible and an official transcript will be published at a later date .
This document contains a transcript of the first part of the
debriefing, during which the crew described the mission generally
from an operational viewpoint.
A preliminary transcript of the re
mainder of the debriefing will be published by September 3, 1965. It
will cover systems operations , operational checks, visual sightings,
experiments , pre-mission planning, mission control , and training.
a i eJ~FIDff:!TIAL
9'0Ni;10ENTll(t
~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paragraph
Page Number
1.0
COUNTDOWN
1.1 Crew Insertion. . . . . . . . . .
,1
1.2 Communications . . . . . . . . . .
. .1
1. 3 Crew Participation and Countdown.
.1
1.4 Comfort. . . . . . . . . .
.1
1.5 Environmental Control System
.2
1.6 Sounds . .
. . . .
2
1.7 Vibrations . . . . . . . . . . .
2
1.8 Visual . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
3
1. 9 Crew Station Controls and Displays
4
2. 0
POWER.ED FLIGHT
2.1 Lift- Off Cues .
. . . .
6
2. 2 Roll Pr ogram
7
2.3 Pitch Program .
8
2.4 Aerodyna.mci.cs.
. . . .
8
2. 5 Environmental Control System. .
9
2. 6 Maximum q . . . . . .
. . . .
9
2. 7 Windshear . . . .
9
2. 8
DCS Update. . . . .
. . . .
9
2. 9 Engine 1 Operati on. .
9
2. 10 POGO. . . . .
10
2. 11 Engine 2 Status .
. . 12
2. 12 Acceleration g' s
. . . .
12
2,13 BEXJO . . . . .
. 12
2. 14 Staging
. . .
. . . .
13
2. 15 Engine 2 Ignition
13
2. 16 RGS Initiat~ . .
~4
2. 17 Fairing Jettison .
15
2,18 GO/ NO GO . .
20
2, 19 Systems Status
21
2. 20 SECO
. 21
2. 21 Steeri11g,
. 22
I'
......
3.0
INSERTION
3. 1 Post- SEXJO . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . 23
3. 2
SEXJO + 20 Seconds . . .
26
3.3 Inser tion Activities . . . .
30
4. 0
ORBITAL FLIGHT
38
Wf.lE>ENTl~E
5.0
RETROFIRE
5. 1
5. 2
5.3
5,4
5.5
5. 6
!R- 36 Events..
~R- 256 Events .
~ - 1 Events . .. .
1R- O Events . .. .
Retropack Jettison.
Communications.
6.0
REENTRY
6.1
6. 2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6. 8
6, 9
6.10
6 . 11
6.12
400 K
. . . . . . .
Acceleration profile.
Spacecr aft control .
100 000 Feet .
.
50 000 Feet ....
35 000 checklist items .
Commtmi cati ons.
. .
10. 6K barostat.
. . .
Main chute deployment
Single point release .
Blood pressure measurements
Postmain checklist items .
7. 0
LANDING AND RECOVERY
7. 1
Impact. . .
.
7,2
Checklists .
.
7.3
Communications.
7.4
Systems Configuration .
7, 5
Spacecraft Status .
.
7. 6
Post- Landing Activities
7,7
Comfort .
. . . . ..
7.8
Recovery Force Personnel .
7.9
Egress .
.
7.10 Survival Gear
7.11 Crew Pickup
Page Number
.168
. 172
.173
. .174
.182
.183
.194
.196
.197
.197
.198
. 202
.202
.202
. 203
. 204
..204
. 205
.206
. . 210
. 211
. 211
. 212
. 213
. 214
. 214
.214
.215
.215
1
1 .0 COUNTDOWN
1.1 Crew Insertion
Cooper
The crew insertion, I thought, went very well .
Conrad
Yes , we had the suiting thing down on my cuffs and
everything so that we got right out t here and, boy,
th& Gunter was ready for us and i n we went .
Cooper
They were all set .
There were no delays and every
thing went exceedingly well on t he gantry.
1. 2 Communications
Cooper
Communications , I thought were good and no probl em at
all on communications, and everything went real well.
Conrad
Yes , Stoney handled that whole thing real well.
Cooper
All right, volume was still down on the little comm
sets in the transfer van there .
That ' s Stoney' s
little improvement .
1 .3 Crew Participation
in Countdown
Cooper
Crew participation in the countdown was good.
I
didn' t see anything at all wrong.
Conrad
Yes, we weren' t rushed.
We felt t hat we had enough
time to get the switches in the right position and
just everything went real good.
1.4 Comfort
Cooper
Comfort was real fine .
We went on to two suit fans
2
Cooper
1.6 Sounds
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
1.7 Vibration
Cooper
right away.
I thought we felt plenty cool the
whole time.
ECS was good.
Never any problem with it .
Sounds , I thought the only sounds tha·; we had that
were abnormal we'd been warned about.
When the
prevalves opened, they were fairly loud and when
the engines gimballed they were quite loud , and
both of those we were aware of the fact that they
would cause a lot of noise and vibrat:.on.
There is something that really dings t he booster
too when they start.. . .
I don ' t--whet her they
drop a platform away.
It ' s before they start moving the gant ry.
Just before they start lowering that erector. Boy,
something really, like it really bangs that booster,
I thought.
I still don't know what it is , but , of
course, we ' d been up there with the erector down
twice before that so we were sort of e~tting used
to those kind of sounds.
Okay, vibrations we already covered tr.at .
Sounds ,
vibrations.
3
1.8 Visual
,.
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
FCSD REP
Conrad
Cooper
/
Visual .
Nothing....
Oh, yes , wait a minute, I started getting this win
dow fogging.
Well, let ' s cover that under the right area.
Well, it was actually in the countdown when the
erector went down before liftoff.
Well , okay, allright .
I mean we still had it later.
Well, you want to cover that now then in systems.
Well, is that what this means , is visual, or does
that just mean something else?
Yes, that' s before liftoff. Powered flight is next .
Yes , well t lri,s-tra-,:5pened 6e:f'1
Allright, even before liftoff,
hat this
really is completely unforgiveable.
Each window
was filthy.
Just fogged completely over, and it was
on the inside of the outer pane of glass . It was
within the sealed unit of glass , and it was so
foggy when they lowered the erector that it
it was frozen over solid,
d neither could
Well, it had fogged over before they lowered the
Conrad
(j()tqflDENTIA[ ,.
I
I
4
erector and then the guys heated it w:.th hot air to
make it go away and that just made th:.ngs wor se when
they lowered the erector.
Cooper
It didn't make it go away all the way.
Conrad
That I s right it made'"it- ~
actually.
Cooper /
L
my side in my window ~etweer. the inside
pane and the two outside panes of\\8-~s , I had a
small bee , and I had a fly, and I had\several
flecks of things that I had written u~ before and
never got corrected, and they were the whole flight,
and I 'm sure they will show up on all the films
and everything.
Now between the outer sealed panes
of glass there were numerous little specks and
of stuff and throughout the flight as . ..well , we ' ll
cover that later, but that was even 7rore the flight
started .
The windows were not pla/n and were not in
good shape to go forthe--f~.
1. 9 Crew Station Contr ols
and Displa_ys
Conrad
I think the Gemini cockpit is a pretty good cockpit.
Cooper
I think in general that crew stations eontrols and
displays were pretty adequate .
Conrad
I 've got a couple comments on switches and things,
but these are. . . .
~FIDENTIAL
5
FCSD REP
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
,.
Okay, how about the time you spent in there on
prelaunch.
Do you think that this is about right?
Yes , yes, I think that this is just about right.
I think that if you cut it down too much more
than that you are going to be....you could cut it
down some more , there's no doubt. .. .
It' s that cabin purge cycles when you're not doing
anything really, and that ' s excellent time.
... that you can cut it down, but that' s the thing
that takes the time for both the ground crews...
and that' s lost time.
I don' t know. ...
I don ' t think you want to rush the crew and now
our count that second day went by the clock, boy.
We got in there at the right time.
We counted down
and lifted off on, and I didn' t feel that I was
rushed, and I didn' t feel that I sat in there for
an excessive amount of time.
No , I didn ' t either. I thought that it went just
about right , time wise .
Long as there ' s no holds in the count everything' s
great.
6
2.1
Lif t Off Cues
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
FtE>ENTI L
2.0
POWERED FLIGHT
Okay, lift- off cues , CAP COM .
CAP CO~ didn ' t come
into the act until later .
Stoney counted us down
thru ignition and lift-off and then CAP COM picked
us up at l ift- off.
Motion is an excellent clue .
There ' s doubt in your mind when you ljft- off.
You
know, the second you lift- off that yot.' ve lifted.
Vibration was very low.
It had dropped out almost completely a.t lift-off,
felt that shaking was very l i ght.
There was very little vibrati on at all .
Okay,
vibration, very l ow.
Noise I thought, was quite
low.
I was particularl y aware of the noises of goi ng
through the max Q regionar y thing.
Oh , t his is
lift-off again .
I thought the noises were very
well at l iftoff .
You know the engines were
running from the outside before, you know, and man
they really make a racket, but from where you are
it's pretty quite.
You know there running.
You
can here them, there's no doubt about that , but .. .
Okay, on visual I don ' t . . . .
We had a very cl ear
day.
There weren't even any clouds in sight on
~
IDENTI~
Conrad
2. 2 Roll Program
Conrad
Cooper
7
C.(&)Hft0ENTI:,\~~
au,
!to
our sight as we were lifting off, and I couldn't
tell any visual cues to lift- off, could you?
You had the feeling that you were moving visually.
After you get your roll program you see it visually
and you can see the pitch program starting visually,
but just at first l ift-off you don't really have
any visual cues .
Cockpit displays are just l ike
advertised.
The two stage - one lights go out, and
. .. just l ike the simulator.
Yes , I watched roll program on the gyro, I was
watching for it to come i n on time and in glancing
up when the roll program started I was still
looking at nothing but blue sky, but I was aware
visually as you say that the booster was rolling.
Yes , you can have a airplane when you are looking
at nothing but blue sky and start a motion and you
may not know exactly what the motion is, but you
know that you are moving.
Now on this cockpit display, something that I got two
different answers to from different people on how the
gyro and the actual case was going to be set and it
suddenly dawned on me that they actually set the gyro
so that you are launching down the 90 degrees. You're
8
Conrad
Cooper
FCSD REP
Cooper
2. 3 Pitch Program
Cooper
2.4 Aerodynamic
Cooper
progressing down to 90 degrees line, e. la the
simulator, although the booster sets on 85 degrees
and when you turn to 72 degrees launch azimuth
you are rolling clockwise so far as tr.e crew is
concerned.
You roll to zero .
But you are rolling to is real ly to O on the gyro
as precessed around so that you are net really
setting on the actual launch azimuth, you are
actually setting so that when you stai§'e on over i n
yaw then pitch over then in your yaw your on the in
plane line.
You're coming down the zero line .
Y01.:. 1re yawing
down the zero l ine .
That 's right, and I kept getting diffe.rent answers
on this and this is in fact the case. Roll program
was exactly right on time and ended e>:actly on time.
Pitch program started exactly on time.
Aerodynamic was nothing new or differE:nt about it.
It was just standard. We build up to the noises at
max Q; the noise built up to gradual level and the
vibration and quantity built up to ma>:~ and then
dropped off very rapidly J.1'd:i!Jitely thereafter.
FlDENTIAL
2. 5
ECS
Conrad
Cooper
Conr ad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
2. 7 Wind Shear
Cooper
2.8
DCS Updates
Cooper
FCSD REP
Conrad
9
CONFICtleNTIA~ •
Right on the button.
ECS was right on the money, no problem at all .
Max Q we ' ve already stated.
The cabin sealed a little bit high like they said
it would.
I forget the number. It was about 5.8.
About 5.8 or 9 and just gradually dwindled back down .
And just after we got in there by the time I looked
at it again after insertion everything it bled down
on our gage to 4.9, our gage read a little low.
I
think the actual reading, you will pr obably find
the cabin actually was 5.1 1 but the whole rest of
t he flight the gage never budged off the 4.9.
The gage stayed right there like it was glued.
The wind shear, we had none and, certainly nothing
that we could tell , but as I understand we ' ve been
told that for that day anyway we had almost negible
wind shear.
DCS updates were right on time.
You had two updates?
1 plus
45, 2 plus 25 .
2,9 Engine 1 Operat i on
Cooper
The engine 1 operation couldn' t have been better,
----~~K)ENTIAL
-------
10
..
2,10 POGO
Cooper
Conrad
(
Cooper
It was beautiful. Just now in between engine 1
operation and engine 2 here we have two items we
will insert in here.
One was POGO..
At 2 mi nutes and 5 seconds we started
picking up POGO and I got a fairly gcod amount of
POGO on through, stopping just at abcut 5 to 7
seconds before staging.
POGO dropped. cl ean out
exactly the same time there that we programmed POGO
on the early days.
Yes, that one surprised me .
We ' d he1:.rd and read
tbat both John 8{!.d Gus ' s and Jim and Ed ' s f l i ght
that they were hardly even aware of IDGO and boy
when it came in on us it was loud anc. clear and,
well Gordon, neither one of us could talk hardly;
we were really vibrating with it and I was hard
pressed to read the displays. By golly , if I had
to re__:-t ;--e num;-er on _
· ~- ~r-ays I- think I woul d
ad -;-:h- - --:b- _ __
, e a:-i sp ___ .,,.
have been hard pressed to do it, because we really
had it pretty good.
Yes , the rate ... the amplitude of them were such
. . . 11 cps frequency and the ampl itude of them was
such that you were on -- you were on the marginal
11
i t
Conrad
RCSD REP
Cooper
FCSD REP
Cooper
FCSD REP
Cooper
edge of reading of any large gage and any fine
reading that you had to read, you would never be
able to read any numbers. It was exactly like
the POGO we did all along on the program up at
Ames and as the exact amplitude, I don ' t lmow, but
was, . . . . .
I think we don ' t want that ~
POGO.
It was no par icu ar y upsetting to me , because I
really was fai rly familiar with POGO having been
through all that POGO program, but this thing kind
of t i ckled me that we got it to see that we had
still hadn' t solved it , but I don ' t think . . .
its something you don ' t want because if you had ot~er
things going wrong during that period of t ime it
would make it vecy difficult to say what you had
wrong or what
It didn ' t upset me, but it surprised me , you lmow,
because I just wasn't expecting POGO.
Wbat g-level would you estimate it to be?
Well , we were sneaking right up there.
I mean the POGO .
Oh, it was right at about 5 g ' s .
·\1•
Well , I mean plus or minus amplitude.
Well I , my estimate on it was that it was something
--
12
on the order of maybe three quarters of a g.
Well, I
don I t !mow whether it was that high c,r not.
Conrad
I thought it was at least a half, if not better.
Apparently it wasn't that high.
I ws.s really
surprised. Like I say, we were really getting the
ramrod out of it.
Cooper
s beyond what we selected as we th~ht
should be the cutoff. It was more tr.an wh~ we
l
had selected at Ames as being max acc7.
in this.I passed up ver b •
there one of
the first things that happened immediately about
the time that we got the pitch program was the
IGS Stage 2 fuel needle failed in thE full -max
deflection position.
And it came back on and was
reading after staging briefly and thEn failed again
during staging.
It was intermittent .
2.11 Engine 2 Status
Cooper
Engine 2 status stayed ... was perfect.
There was
not anything wrong at all.
2.12 Acceleration G' s
Cooper
Acceleration g ' s were right on the piofile, were
certainly very pleasant.
Nothing wrong at all with them.
2. 13 BECO
13
Cooper
BECO was right on the money.
..
2 . 14 Staging
Conrad
Boy, that staging was smooth too.
Cooper
They told us that BECO was going to occur early, but
it was
Conrad
We did loft a little bit apparently like they said
we woul d because, right after staging ....
2. 15 Engine 2 I gnition
Conrad
Well , Engine 2 ignition, I wasn't even hardly aware of
that other than we just started to get a little, yc,11
know, we just sort of went off the peg at 6 g's and
Gordo said s t aging OK and Engine 2 is good and I
wasn ' t even aware that Engine 2 had lit.
You
can' t hear it, to speak of, but you can feel the
acceleration slowly building up.
FCSD REP
Did you see anything visually?
Conrad
No , I didn't see anything.
I heard the other guys
talking about see the flash at the brig.
Never
saw a thing and I wasn't aware of any flash out
there either.
I\
Cooper
J didn ' t see anything at all at BEDO.
The best clue
that I have on my side, is that I see the Fuel
and Oxidizer needles start coming down as the engine
14
2.16 RGS Initiate
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
FCSD REP
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
•
starts burning.
And then they coming c.own fairly
rapidly at first, I mean you get a very definite
motion on them right at first there and. they kind of settled
out. Engine 2 ignition we've already covered.
RGS initiate right on the money.
I was going to mention that we had l of t ed and
that we were expected to pitch down a.nd we did when
it picked up RGS.
It smoothed in very smooth, and the fading was
just right.
The IGS needle really deflected and I ~as , you know,
I don't think it pitched, it didn't peg- out , but it
did make a large dip and then when the booster
came down just pitched down very smoottly down to
about 75 or 80 degrees, I guess it pitched down
almost 10 degrees.
What rate did it pitch over?
Very slow, but steady, at just
It took about 20 seconds I guess to fade it in there.
The needle came in and made a big deflection and
right after that the booster started pitching and
the needle started back and boy the needl e was
•
15
CQ~ElDEhJIJA
back and thing was right on the money at about 80
degrees. It was a very smooth transition and then
do you remember they were telling, us to look
for this one cps oscillation? Well, I didn't have
rate needl es like Gordo did, but I wasn't aware of
any oscil lations at any time.
That booster was in
pitch and yaw as far as that went
Cooper
Those rate needles were like they were glued .
There was never through boost or second stage was
there ever any rate except that one tiny little
rate, one teensy little rate just at when we were
in POGO we got one tiny little longitudinal rate,
'
just one tiny little fleck on a rate, and was the
only one.
Otherwise it was just smooth as silk,
the whole time, rate wi se .
2.17 Fairing Jettison
Cooper
Fairing jettison.
We jettisoned fairings at 3:25
and man do they ever go.
Conrad
I counted Gordo down to them.
Okay, yes, that ' s
a good point .
Cooper
Beside the scanner fairing and the nose fairing go
and when the nose fairing went it went with all
kinds of debris .
There were pieces flying all
16
over.
Conrad
Yes , and I don't think it went right .
I don't
believe it went right , because the Rand R can
was ripped up in the front , and I can show you on
my side the nose went like that and there was some
tape or fiber glass that goes around t he . . ..
It was fiberglass cloth and it was all broken loose
in jagged flaps sticking up t hat, you lmow, had
broken loose from along in here when i.hat cover
went I had decided impression that the cover went
off askew, that it didn't jettison t he: way i t should
have.
And this could be a good point of putting
it back to after insertion.
Cooper
Well, it ' s supposed to go off askew.
Conrad
Yes , well, it just di dn ' t go off clean .
That 's why
this was ripped up, see .
Cooper
Well, it something somebody might look into, but
you don ' t want to recommend that they put back to
after insertion , because your taking a weight
penalty to carry that all the way up.
Conrad
Yes, I realize that , but . . . .
Cooper
It was designed to go off ... .
Conrad
That was the reason in the first place that they
WIDE
17
moved it up there anyhow, because they weren't ....
Cooper
No , the reason they moved it up there was because
they didn ' t have strong enough propulsion on those
squibs and spring combinations or whatever they use.
We never did get a reading on that, but whatever
the total propulsive expulsion system wasn't kick
ing, the scanner fairing wide enough but what they
would come back into the booster. But didn't you
have the distinct impression that the nose fairing
broke into jillions of pieces when it blast.
Conrad
I certainly, I certainly, yes .
That ' s why wh~n
I say askew, I mean something didn't look right.
I can't put my finger on it, but -
Cooper
It came off in many pieces anyway.
There were many,
many pieces and the whole area was just filled with
debris.
Conrad
Yes, and then, I 'm not sure that that's when we got
all that gl op on our windshiel d, the spots ...
Cooper
Well, I noted exactly at that time immediately
after the fairing went, I noted about 5 or 6, I
saw them hit , 5 or 6 gray splots, just small ones ,
very small little gray-type splots and I was
distinctly looking for that and watching for it and
18
Conr ad
Cooper
Conrad
FCSD REP
they were not there before they were t'nere and I
;
saw them when they hit.
They hit duri:'.l.g all this
debris flying around period.
I think that you can sti11 f i nd them o:'.l. the
windshields .
They didn ' t burn off during reentry.
But they' re not bad and there are just a few little
scattered ones and I think it might be interesting
t o compare how many you get there versus and how
many you get when you jettison them in orbit. It
may wel l be that jettisoning in orbit would be pre
ferabl e , but I didn ' t f i nd anything objectionable
t o jettisoning where they went, they wenm fine.
It did add a lot of debris and I agree with Pete
there was a big torn something or other out there
which may just be a fiberglass thing that is kind
of . .. ,.
Yes , I want to get down and look at the R and R and
and I can tell you what it was , describe it a lot
better.
We' ll probably have some pictures of it
too in the camera somewhere.
I know it 'll show
up in some film.
How l ong was this visible? You say there was a big
bunch of stuff out there.
ONFIDENTIAL
19
Cooper
There ' s a whole fly.
Oh, you mean the debris .
It
was gone.
Conrad
It was gone like that, but it just looked like the
whole darn thing exploded.
Cooper
It looked like it just flew into a jillion pieces.
It was all around you for maybe a period of a
second or two.
Conrad
I didn't think it was that much, i t was just gone.
Cooper
But it was a defininite period of time when you
were aware of all this debris all over and then
clear.
Okay, enough for fairing jettison.
20
2. l8 GO/NO GO
Cooper
FCSD REP
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
GO/NO GO:
We never got a GO/NO GO beeause we lost
our number 1 radio in about 4 minutes sometime just
prior . . . let see we got a .8 . . . .
Wti got a V
over VR of . 8 .
We got a GO/NO GO of ,..
You did get a , 8?
We got a .8.
Yes , that comes much later - that com(!S after the
GO/NO GO.
Yes, that ' s right , okay, well I don ' t remember
ever getting a ... yea, we did, we go·~ MCC GO.
Right we got a GO/NO GO , okay, but then
immediately after . 8 we never got any·':hing at all
from there on until aft er we were insi~rted and gone
to UHF No. 2.
I think it must be in the antenna problem, I really
do .
Well , there 's some problem there because the same
thing happened on one of the previous flights and
we definitely and completely lost radio and I
switched over just before we inserted,
I switched
over to number 2 and then when I call1~d but the
IVI's we were back with them then .
21
2. 19 Systems Status
Cooper
System Status everything .. . .
Conrad
We did have ... Let me describe the delta P
\
lights .
Shortly after liftoff I got the number 1
fuel cell delta Plight and I reported i t and just
about t he time I reported it, then the number 2
fuel cell delta Plight came on.
They stayed on
all the way through boost and they were on aft er
insertion for ten, fifteen seconds and after that
they went right back out again and that) i s it.
It didn't effect anything on the fuey e11 operation,
the voltages , /thing stayed fine
• bein
n----tliere was no other way of
telling the~ was out of tolerance so I don 't think
it is a problem.
We expected it.
Cooper
I 'm glad that we had them changed to orange rather
than red .
Conrad
Yeah, yeah.
Cooper
Systems status in addition to that I don ' t think we
had any systems that were exactly right, except
the radio and the acceleration as we had expected
it . We were right on the profile.
SECO was ...
2. 20
SECO
tn currents ,
other than
!Oa!IIAL
22
Conrad
Cooper
2.21 Steering
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
FCSD REP
Conrad
Cooper
I think we burned out at, Gordo, 7 anc. 1/4 g's.
Right.
SECO was exactly on time, just exactly on
time and IVI's read 002 AFT.
Almost ierfect.
Steering was ... there was no steerine· accelerations
or velocities that we could tell. Steering was
just smooth as silk, apparently they :t.ad us going
right down the slot.
And when we came off, apparently
we were lined up well because there weren ' t any
rates because when we came off and wajted our 20
seconds there were no rates whatsoever and it was
just setting there just . . . . as smootr.. as
As stable as a rock.
As smooth as silk so that and when we started
thrusting and separating we came off :ust right
straight forward .
No deviation, no skidding around
or anything. Just right straight off,
I thought the IVI's were plus 2.
That ' s what I haVle
written down here.
Plus 28 right, 3 t.p.
I guess that's what it was.
This velocity you read?
I was going to cover that in your ... ,
Your right, plus 2, it was -- that's :r·ight.
Plus
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
3,1 Post SECO
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
23
~IE>l!NTtAE
002.
I have all the computer readouts .
008 right and how many up?
3 up.
MANEUVER CONTROLLER worked fine .
We went right
through ....
Wel l, l et ' s go through t hat. The way we had practice
SECO, Gordo, got SECO and Gordo unstowed the
CONTROLLER and I armed the BUS ARM Swit ch so that
we get the MSC- 1 doors OFF.
Brought the propulsion power ON.
Brought the ATTITUDE CONTROL Electric Power ON.
Went from RATE COMMAND to DIRECT.
Armed the
switch and hit the computer.
Armed t he sep
spacecraft thing and Gordo and I counted the
seconds down .
In the meantime , I punched off
address 72 so that it was reading and then in 20
seconds we had SEP s/c ....
In 20 seconds I start ed and I called it out and
started thrusting and Pete would hit the sep
spacecraft ... .
Conrad
The reason we did that was so that we would have
the inertial velocity readout on the ga.ge and that
was ·beautiful 25,808 and nominal was S-.lpposed to be
25,807.
You can't ask for a better calculation
from a computer than that, and a lot of people
don ' t have much faith in that thing but, I think
that I'll bet that the computed MCC figure isn't
more than a foot or two off. I t couldn ' t be
because everything was nominal for hours and hours
in the past, Day's it went that way where we
stayed on the flight plan to the minute, to the
second so I know that it was a good computation,
and I have the five address readouts that we read,
We read out address 72 as 25,808; address 94 which
was R dot for gamma was plus 20 feet which is
pretty darn small so we must have almost a zero
gamma address 97 which is the forward IVI was plus
2 feet; address 52 was perfect, it was zero.
So
there was no adjustment needed and if there had
been an adjustment needed that would ha:ve come
at 3,042 seconds on the computer if tbere had been
an address .
52 correction and nominal 3,008
seconds so the computer computed the nomi nal thing
off only by less than a minute, about a half a
25
minute of what the actual nominal value
/een , so I think thats pretty darn good
ascent routine in that comput er, and I think hat
(
now that we have Math flow 6 in there t his i
why I
think the guy shouldn't get so darn worried in MCC
underspeeds and giving them burn co/rections
t his Mickey Movse.
I' ve been
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Cooper
Conrad
t rying to make tbis pein-t-ewe· since we got
associat ed with . . . .
I think we had better immediate data avail abl e on
board than people have been giving it credit for .
That ' s right, and it really pleased me to see it
come out on the computer this way.
And had we never gotten our communications back
we would have known that we were i n good shape
because of the data we had on board, we didn' t
have to worry about the ground readouts and
what to do; we would have known what to do whether
we had been under or over or anything else.
Attitudes and rates , t here weren ' t any rat es .
The thing was steered right down the slot .
We
came off smooth.
Spacecraft separation
NflD~NTlAk
26
CONF:10ENT-IA
Cooper
We separated as smooth as silk just r i ,5ht straight
.;;
ahead
Conrad
Well, we counted down and Gordo said h? was
ready and I SEP spacecraft and he thru3ted and I
went back to RATE COMMAND for them and we came
straight off.
I didn't even feel it .
The first
t hing we felt was thrust .
Cooper
And rolled upright and went to 000 00 -15 which
happened to be right on the horizon.
As it
t urned out that 15 figure was good. It read out
the IVI•s .
FCSD REP
That's, you know on 4 . . . they thought they came
off the booster.
Conrad
Yes, that's why I mentioned that because
Cooper
That's what we were looking for, too,
3.2 SEGO Plus 20 Seconds
Cooper
We've already mentioned the IVI displays .
Space
craft separation occurred very smoothly. Thrusting
was smooth, nothing wrong at all .
Attitude rates
were good.
Conrad
Yes, I don't understand this!
I don't understand
this guy saying that they can't hear them or they
can ' t sense them.
Boy, I was easily aware . . . .
..
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
FCSD REP
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
FCSD REP
FHID~Nf lAL
27
1/
You can feel t hem almost mo,-e than you can hear
them.
You can feel them vibrate really, more than
you can hear them.
I mean, you can hear them
too, but the vibrat ion you can hear them too, but
t he vi bration you can f eel the thrust.
Have you ever heard a high speed hose or high speed
water jet. Shhh ... That 's the impression that I
had.
Yes, that ' s right.
Even from the aft firing thruster?
Ever y thruster we had on t here.
We heard every thruster on the whol e f l ight
It never occurred in my mind when the thrus t ers
were fired.
You can feel them and I can hear them.
I couldn't hear them in the sense of an expl osive
sound or a roar. It sounded like wat er swishing.
Yes , very definitely, more a Shhh.
And I was aware of it again when we made the burns
later on, you know, we made the reverse coelliptic
stuff and all that.
How did these noises , the thruster noises , sound
compared with the way the last crew set the
mission simulator?
'
28
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Hey, that's another interesting point.
They're not very close on pulse.
Pulse is a ...
•
Pulse is more of a thump.
That 's the one sound that does sound like you ' d
expect a rocket engine to sound.
Here ' s a sound just about like this :
(knock)
Yes , it very definitely sounds like a knock.
There is no "shhh" or roar, just a little thud.
You can hear it just like somebody knccking at the
back of the spacecraft.
You can hear it go "tap
tap, tap, tap, tap, tap,"
Really, the simulator doesn I t sound tl:.e right way.
It 's a general enough nature and it tl::.e same type
manner
Yes, it is close enough to give you a good cue.
The platform mode for instance , you krow, when i t
goes shh, shh, shh, shh ... did the same thing i n
the spacecraft except it was all in one thump
and swooshes when it was constantly firing the
thrusters it sounded like the swish.
The air-to- ground communications I thought was
excellent the whol e time.
I didn't find anythi ng
,
29
Conrad
..
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
FCSD REP
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
ONEl0EtslJl~E
wrong.
We really had good comm the whole flight.
There was never a time -- the only time
the
only fault we find was one or two times through the
remote site when the MCC was trying to remote to
these sites they would get some fading.
I must
say the HF worked excellent. When they were
~r~usic, broadcasting music to us, my\
gosh they had us practically the world round on
'-----~The music quality was quite _g0od
in most cases.
I got times on that we can bring out later so that
they can correlate how far
GO/NO GO , there wasn't any problem on that. They
gave us the GO right away.
How long did it take them to give this?
Oh, heck, immediately.
Almost immediately.
.> vveaf
There was no swivel because there was no velocity
~
correction.
There was no velocity correction needed. Orbit
quantitites were good, they had those for us.
It took them quite a while to read us our experiments
but they just said you have a nominal orbit and then
mayb_e . . . .
.
eQNFIE>ENTl~t
I
Conrad
I've got down here the GMT of liftoff.
I wrote down
...
13 plus 59 plus 59 which they l ater change to 14
plus 00 plus 00.
I have the one A time they got
"
it up to us okay, which was 10 pl us 11.
Then I
have the 2 dash 1 they gave us was 01 pl us 27 plus
16 which they later revised to 01 plus 26 plus 27,
I wrote those down.
3.3 Insertion Activities
Cooper
Okay, l et 's start on inser tion activities. SAFE
t he swi tches we did that just right for our check
list .
In fact , we are even more convinced than ever
that a good, thorough, accurate, checklist is the only
thing to have and
Conr ad
Physically marked them off when they "·er e done.
Cooper
We followed it conscientiously.
The sequential
light t ests, we did it j ust by the teE.ts.
Stowage:;
. we already had modified our checklistE, ·and we already
had written on some of it that we would do these i f
we decided to.
For instance, the D- rlng safety pin,
we did install them at right t i me, and there was no
problem on those; they wer e nruch easi•~r under zero-g
to get in and out than we had thought and I had no
31
Conrad
..
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
.kQt4FIDfNJ1A.L,
trouble getting my D-ring in, did you?
I waited on mine, remember.
Yes , you waited . .. .
I s towed my D- ring thing
So we closed the cover immediately and I decided I
woul d go ahead and see if I could get mine, and I
got to i t right away and it went right in, so I
put it in.
We, of course, got in trouble in the second orbit ,
but we did not unstrap or put t he drogue pins in
the seat or unstow any items of gear other than the
flight plan books and the 16mm camera and the
Hasselblad.
I take it back.
We went through the
Flight Plan as advertised and then stowed the items.
We had D-2 canera out, the Blob out, but we did this
in the proper places in the Flight Pl an. But we
never did unstrap.
We never unstrapped and never put the drogue pins
in until after we go to 6 - 4 GO.
We got a
6 - 4 GO.
But we restowed too , after we got in t rouble.
We
throught maybe having to go into 6-4 why,
we'd put ourselves back into the configuration
32
Cooper
Conrad
were never up.
to reenter
lready decided
t hat I was not going to launch with th£~
They
"
are just useless as far as I am concerr..ed, and I
as delighted I did not have them; and I didn ' t
miss
I don't think, I think
could remove th€m and
-
The arm restraints are there for the pressurized
case and high altitude ejection.
I did go with
mine up.
I would prefer to go with thEim down, but
there wasn't any reason , I didn ' t need to get my
hands on the hand control or anything ~.o I left
them as they were, but I don' t think tr.ey were
necessary.
•
FtDENTtAL
33
Cooper
Okay, belts .
I couldn' t ~~ he
belts .
The harness - While we're on the harness, I
don ' t like that harness worth anything.
t hink what we need is a simple type adjustable type
harness wi th clips on the legs that you can undo
legs to get to some of the functions you have to:
uri pation and defecation and so on in the spacecy ft .
I do ' t see why we have to have a big, expensi/e, custom,
made ha~ss that you can' t readily get on
off
and this on~ you can not readily get
and if
you had one with
on it and snaps
like you do on
harness, it would
be, I think, a hundred times useful as this one .
Conrad
Let me ask you a ~uestion.
Do you really - now, do
you r eally - I agree.
Let me say this.
I agree you
should first be able to get your harness on and off,
but in zero-g I ' m not convinced that three, especially
two leg snaps type arrangement.
In other words, a
harness that would come completely loose and have
many straps that hitch to the other straps would be
really good in zero- g.
What I think we need to do is
to be able to get in and out of that harness that we
have, easier.
Like, maybe you could loosen the leg
straps on it but not have them come apart.
Now, I
~
NftDENTrAL
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
took my harness off in flight twice.
I took 1 em
"
off once-
Yeah, but you wouldn' t even have to step through these
::
leg loops if you had - just like on an airplane harness.
You could undo that and you wouldn' t eve·'.l. have to worry
about the leg loops.
Then all you 1d have to do is just
slide out of the torso area.
Yeah.
Well» lets sees that' s what I'm saying. If you
unhook both of those leg loops and you throw the whole
thing down in the footwell and then you pull it back up
again you got a leg strap floating off ever here and
you got a-
Well that' s no problem. It ' s no worse i.han it is find
ing your lap belt.
Did you ever have i;rouble getting
your lap belt back on after you took it off?
I always hitched it on the Velcro over on the side.
But you never had any trouble ~ ting t o it. I didn ' t .
/
I let mine float free and I never had any trouble getting
t o them at all .
Well, I just don 1 t lmow now. I really d:i.dn' t think it
was that bad getting in and out of this harness .
My
only concern was that if- - I stayed-
How many times did you get i n and out of it?
~
( OhJFt0!
35
Conrad
Twice.
The big problem was having you unhitch the
straps on my suit.
Cooper
That' s right.
With the cables to go over the harness.
Conrad
The harness--the easiest thing was getting in the legs .
That was no problem at all.
Cooper
Yeah.
Conrad
Where I needed help was getting over my shoulder and
getting the straps on the suit hitched back up again,
which is a two man operation.
Cooper
Well, my point is that for normal wearing around the
pad area or wearing around when your suited and every
thing, you' d be much more comfortable if you could have
those straps loose where they' re not gouging you in
the legs,
Conrad
Yes, well-- Oh, I agree.
Cooper
Or where you had adjustments on them . ...
Conrad
. .. adjustments see-
Cooper
Okay, well .
Conrad
Where you coul d make the legstraps loose but you' d
never disconnect them so you don' t have free floating
straps around t here. It was no big problem ....
Cooper
My suggestion would be to have them exactly like you
did in a parachute harness .
You have the leg adjust
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
ment and on that same fitting you have the little snap
"
wher e you can unsnap in the places you want to.
Oh yes, you dan do it either way.
Sure.
You cou,Yd either loosen them or--I just thi
we've
gone to such complex tailoring devices in orde
f
ovide some company with a great elaborate pro
of
providing expensive harnesses that they .. .
per
sonally don ' t think they ' re worth a darn for what they're
·ntended for .
I don' t think you gain that much.
I
think'y~u loose a lot of it.
~
stow
that harness .
The life7 est.
Now I disagree wit everybody that ' s ever
said that those aren ' t in the way.
e were them all
the time mainly because we didn ' t hav a darn place to
I
si ore them and they're a pain in the Ii,leck t o get on and
off but they are really in the way.
The;r' re in the way
@f everything you do.
They bump int0 your arms .
Tbey' re there to cut down visibilit
on ;rour chest and
they ' re just a nuisance,
Yeah,
e didn' t have a place t
store them.
We didn ' t
store them or we'd have taken
them off and left them off.
I am here t o say t hat I
ONFTDENTl~t
37
think they ' re r eally bad where they are.
Conrad
After the big sweat was over and we got a GO and we
were relatively sure we were going to stay there for
awhile unless we, you lmow, had some other emergency
come up, I would have preferred to take off the harness
and the life jacket and stow it somewhere if we ' d
have had a place to stow it.
Cooper
Right.
Conrad
But the other thing is that maybe that' s just my per
sonal feeling.
I ' m extremely meticulous and we kept
that spacecraft as empty as possible.
Everything had
it' s place and it stayed in it ' s place .
Cooper
And that harness and the vest--are pret t y big, bulky
items -
Conrad
And I wasn' t going to have it rattling around down there
on the floor, loose.
Cooper
Okay, on the drogue pins .
By golly, I thought those
new l i ttle things on the drogue pins made them very easy
to get in and out.
There wasn' t a bit of problem wit h
those.
Conrad
I popped the drogue pins in and out on mine .
Coope~
I put mine i n or out once just to ... .
Conrad
I think Gordo put his own in and out once to see if he
could do it and he coul d.
That worked real well .
Cooper
Okay.
Fuel Cell o and Fuel Cell Hydrogen Quantity Read.
2
Yes, we read them at least a million times .
Fuel Cell
•
Power Readings .
Yes , everything checked out fine on
t hose.
Bermuda 2- 1 update: fine.
Orbital Flight.
FCSD Rep
You' d better get out your flight plan on this because
t his is the original stuff I was telling you about.
Conrad
Well, that ' s all right .
This probably will go fairly....
FCSD Rep
All three, if you go the way you did it.
4.0 Orbital Flight
Cooper
Okay, on 4.0 Orbital Fli ht. Platform Alinement.
Conrad
There' s our first problem.
Cooper
There' s our first problem.
Our plat orm mode did not
work and I don ' t lmow what ' s wrong wit
but the
darn thing does not zero out
on the space
I
craft. It allows a good
e to sit in
there and won ' t zero it out and it is ex remely sl oppy
·n pitch.
The whole thing, I think tb7:r was something
~rong with the whole thing because it d esn' t work at
I
a \ 1 like the ones in the simulator, an
the whole thing
...
plu's or minus a half a degree
a very, ver y
system
lucky to be plus or
thing really wrong with it.
I personall y think that
~pl&f~T A~
39
\
something was wired up wrong or something in i t because
it was not working right.
Conrad
We didn ' t really get a chance to evaluate it too well
because we had trouble with it so we stopped using it
and by the time we ' d been able to do anything with it
we had other problems, fuel problems and so forth . So
we never did get back to using it again.
Cooper
Well, we had other control system problems which were
overpowering, platform problem wise, but we did try one
burn on the platform and it was a terrible mistake.
The
darn thi ng did not have the accuracy to really hold it
and we got one foot per second in and out of plane there.
Conrad
Yeah. That was in those coeliptic .
Cooper
In one of those, that coeliptic burns and we ~ade our
other burns then on Rate Command and man, that Rate
Command system is just beautiful. It holds that space
craft so tight that it can ' t vary.
Conrad
Yeah.
We had a beautiful control system, I thought.
When
Gordo made any of the burns on the Rate Command or
anything l i ke that it really responded - well.
Coope1:
Rate Command has tremendous torqueing.
Boy, it ' s strong
and it ' s instantaneous and you can just stop it right on
the money.
Really good.
40
FCSD Rep
Okay, on this platform alinement thing.
You went to
SEF and caged and SEF and Platform Control Mode,
Cooper
We pitched down to visual when we went to CAGE and then
went to SEF and we went to Platform mode and after fid
dling around with it awhile we decided the Platform mode
wouldn' t work so I went to Pulse and then I , just using
my needles , Platform needles then, I just pulsed the er
rors out until we torqued around and got the ... got
it ... on a fine line.
Conrad
Okay, Now, there' s no doubt in my mind that the Primary
Scanners , there' s no doubt in my mind now, but we lost
on Primary Scanners .
We started to aline the primary
Scanners and I don' t think we ever got to platform aline
correctly because the primary scanners were not working
correctly,
Cooper
Now the primary scanners,
The funny part of it is the
Primary Scanner was working in such a rr.anner - working
just enough, that it checked right because when we checked
out t he alinement of it and the tolerances on it it was
working fine,
but there was something in it on one of
the tests that we did later showed thai it was actually
driving, tending to drive the spacecraft down.
Conrad
Continuing to torque you down to about fifteen degrees
nose- down,
Cooper
..
Conrad
FCSD Rep
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
41
•
Or more .
In other words, it continued to try to aline t he platform
at about fifteen degrees . It tried to put the nose on t he
horizon is what it did.
It tried to aline the platform up at fifteen degrees
nose down?
Or more.
I figured it was about somewhere around-
Well, one time it alined us at about 40 degrees nose
down and it still was indicating in scanner limits .
The scanner got worse as the flight went on, but I don ' t
think it ever worked correctly.
No . I don't think it did, now I look back.
That' s the thi ng right there and I think that this-
I 'd l i ke to know what they decided from tracking the
REP on how we put the REP out because we put the REP
out in the proper position, but I don 't think the
platform was alined correctly . We had trouble with that
scanner in the sunlight on the horizon and this was right
when we were using it to aline - just before we put the
REP out.
Just as we were using it to aline and put t he REP out,
the Scanner began to skew all the platform needles off
and it skewed off and, --went to ORBIT RATE.
42
L
Conrad
Now wait til we get the onboard tapes because the tape
recorder was working and this all is on the onboard tape;
the conversation that Gordo and I had about that.
So
we weren' t really sure it was working right but it
f
wasn't that far off that we were going in the dark-
Cooper .
Approximately 30 seconds before we had to pitch around
or had to yaw around to eject the REP, I had to go back
to CAGE and try getting a real rapid P]atform aline in
there, SEF and PULSE and I had the neec.les zeroed and we
may not have been so far off but you don ' t know.
That
isn' t enough time to really get it alined.
In other
words.
I had about the time we did it and got there we
probably had maybe, 30 seconds to Plat::orm aline.
That' s
about all we had.
Conrad
Well, we were just hoping that if it had been pulled off
only in pitch why, you know, we ' d get it right--we'd pull
the pitch right back in again.
Cooper
But the scanner was acting up very badly by that time.
FCSD Rep
How long did you aline the Platform initially?
Cooper
Initially, we alined the platform for about 15 to 20
minutes and it seemed to aline allright although at that
time Pete and I had a discussion right then that we seemed
to be alining nose down.
..
Conrad
Now, you see.
Here ' s something that I've never heard
from the other guys .
Cooper
Now there' s another thing.
See, we never had a simulator
to show us .
Never once did we have any darn thing to
show us what out the window should look like.
Conrad
And when the Platform is alined and you' re zero- zero- zero,
boy, oh boy! That' s a , just - It's a very peculiar looking
situation and it' s not what I expected to see at all .
Cooper
No , it isn' t me either.
Conrad
And I ' ve never heard either Gus of John or Jim and Ed say
"Put a little gouge out" Now I ' ve got a gouge tha t I
can draw for you where I 'm sure that I can put the Plat
form in roll and pitch within a degree in roll and pitch
of where it should be out the window on the horizon and
it ' s by using the corner of the window and the RCS
thrusters on the front : the front RCS yaw thruster in
the lower corner of the window and you can put the
Platform-- you can put the spacecraft zero- zero and roll
and pitch just, well, like that.
We didn' t know that
before we went.
Cooper
This is one of my strongest recommendations if we aren' t
going to have any kind of a visual out the window display
at least we ought to get some of the great planners to
•
-----
44
•
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
draw up on a piece of paper what the window, what the
;:
horizon should look like through the window whic~
d
requested several times and never got -- to show ~~~) guy
what these various things should look like out the
......__
window;'---...We spent the whole darn eight days trying to
~rt=--'l;fl:e-s-0--~~~43 ~ould look like
and I'm not sure we were very clear on it to the day
we re- entered,
Yeah.
Now that's ridiculous!
And it ' s becau:3e of this odd
angle that you sit off in there. It completely fouls
up everytning, as to getting these various angles:
inverted and right side up and 90 degrees angles and
all this .
/1think we ought t;=-I ' ll tell you i;~ d recommen
dation for the guys who are going to
do this on GT- 7 with that Hasselblad can take a pound
or two of fuel and sit up there and pl:.otograph
the camera back inside the spacecraft
get
the window perspective in this thing.
zero- zero- zero, bank right 90, bank lnft 90, at ifferent
nose pitches above the horizon,
<iOt◄r ,eeNirrXt
Really, we sat ther e and had hours worth of discussions
in drifting flight when we'd be drifting through, you
know, and we ' d say, "Hey, doesn' t that l ook like they'r:e
about 30 degrees nose up and roll right 60 degrees?" and
then we ' d try to find those lines and match them and
see . . . there ' s an awful lot of learning there.
By
golly, if we ' d have a Platform Aline Gouge, a visual
gouge idea, we'd have picked up this trouble right off
the bat.
We real ly didn't think the platform. was
alined right, but we really didn't have anything to
tell us t hat it wasn' t .
Cooper
Now looking at it where we know now after we went to the
other scanner finally and we got proper operation knowing
what we learned during the flight it appears now like
we were--the number one scanner was trying to aline us
several degrees down over what it should.
Conrad
Yeah.
FCSD Rep
Did you ever go back to Primary after that?
Cooper
Oh. We checked it a lot of times after that and tried
it numerous times and it got worse and worse and worse
and it finally was actually driving the spacecraft down
to minus 90 degrees and still the scanner, that' s the
funny part of it, the scanner wouldn't go off until you
were about 60 degrees below the horizon.
46
Conrad
It seems to me we ' ve got some data for them on Primary
scanner over the states so they could h~ve it on telemetry,
They should be able to find out what happened on that,
Cooper
Yes, something was really fouled up, I think,
Insertion
Check List-
Conrad
We went through it by the numbers ,
Cooper
By the numbers , Thruster and Control Mode Check - we went
t hrough by the numbers.
Everything was fine .
Conrad
Well, we were a little bit late,
We get a little bit
behind and it was about the time when we were late per
forming the thruster control mode check because that was
supposed to be done before you got to the Canaries and
we did it after the Canaries .
Cooper
That' s right,
Conrad
We were behind, but we started catchine: up.
,
Cooper
FCSD Rep
Cooper
FCSD Rep
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
ee,~FID El'<ITIAI!
Com Systems Check.
We were right on the money, on time,
on that.
Everything checked out okay on that?
Yeah.
Com System?
D-4, D-7, I did by checkoff list and checked out
okay over Carnarvon.
6-4 GO/NO GO, well, that was quite late.
No.
We got a GO for 6-4 over Carnarvon.
That's
just to get past 2- 1.
Okay, Yeak Okay, got the 6-4 GO/NO GO, that ' s right,
D-4, D-7 GO/NO GO.
Those were right on the money
and everything was fine there.
Third adjustment
maneuver.
Was nominal
Was nominal end everything was fine there.
Power
down D-4, D- 7 was nominal. 16mm, 35mm, D-6 equipmert
unstowed and mounted and there we begin to deviate
a little because just prior to this time we began
to get this rapid decrease in the -well- where
was it there?
It was-let me go into the log-book here for one
second because I got some.
48
FCSD Rep
Cooper
Conrad
-
This Perigee adjust.
Did you do that i::1 Rate- is
that the one you did in Rate Command?
Or is that
the one you tried in PLATFORM?
~
Did that in PLATFORM and it worked fine on that one.
Did that one in PLATFORM and it worked ,~eat, but
then on some of these other burns we did I tried
it in PLATFORM and it really didn 1 t work well at
all. That 's why I rather suspect the P::.ATFORM
thing. There's something wrong with it .
I think
i t was better at some times than others . It was
allowing a lot of drift.
Okay, in the log book I have it at 50 m:.nutes which
is just prior to Carnarvon that I found the Fuel
Cell o2 and H Heater Circui t Breaker OFF.
Now
2
that--I found it off because they told us to heat
the Hydrogen not the Oxygen, but the Hydrogen final
ly drilled down to the 220 and they want ed us to
use the heater and I turned the heater on and I
noticed that I didn 1t get any ammeter rise and so
I looked at the circuit breaker panel and the
Circuit Breaker was OFF.
So, now in ret rospect
seei?hg·the o ON which is on the same circuit
2
breaker burned out, I'm sure that it blE,w when this
thing burned out,
f
..
FCSD Rep
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
FCSD Rep
Conrad
Cooper
Cooper
Conrad
We were at the power do':m. on the D- 4 and D- 7.
Oh Yeah.
Well, about that time I think we were
getting back on the Flight Plan.
We got the 16mm
out.
We got the 35mm out.
D- 6 equipment was
Well, it ' s really D-2, it ' s what it was and I had
that work so I decided, "I 'll put together in
pieces at the blob and the camera put together
separately and they had it all loaded with the
right film and everything and had it on the floor,
and we were ready to go . "
Were you pushed for time to do this?
We were right on the money.
We finally caught up
after Canaries and we were on the schedule at
Carnarvon.
Yeah.
We were in good shape at Carvarvon.
Radar test #6, at 01: 30, that worked fine .
We did
bring it on.
It worked.
Observed the transients
on R dot, range and range rate.
6-4 Preretro command
load came out fine .
Blood pressure on the Command
Pilot there past Carnarvon, let's see.
Now that
was back over the Cape here, yeah.
No , you broke the O-ring didn ' t you? Right off the
IAL
50
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
FCSD Rep
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
:JI
bat we broke the 0-ring.
..
That 's right. That ' s right .
That 's the first
one.
We broke the 0- ring and couldn' t give them
that blood pressure.
I think that was the one.
That 's right.
We final ly gave that one up,
The
0-ring was broken on that one.
Let's see .
This first blood pressure that you got
an hour...
They got that one and then when Gordo-
When I, When we transferred over to me and I
plugged it in the ... 0-ring broke and ,:e didn't
have time for that pass again .
We had a bunch more 0-rings .
I forget when we fixed
it but we fixed it.. .
Fixed somewhere around there.
...shortly thereafter.
M-1 experiment.
We turned it on on time.
51
..
.,.
Cooper
Conrad
FCSD Rep
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
FCSD Rep
Cooper
Conrad
FCSD REP
Cooper
Conrad
FCSD REP
Conrad
Yeah.
I got a lot of comments later on that on.
That
thing is so noisy.
Oh, you know, I found out what happened, you know.
They
went back and recomputed and they found out they had four
days worth of air in the bottle--Ha Ha!
Four days?
Yeah. It ran out.
But the thing.
You can turn it off and it keeps run
ning back there.
And it goes SMACK- CHOO , SMACK- CHOO ,
SMACK- CHOO .
Yeah, it 1 s pretty noisy.
And in a real ~uiet cockpit it really sounds loud.
This radar test #6 here at O1:3O
Used to turn the radar on.
Used to turn it on.
Used to turn it to standby.
Turn it to standby and warm it up.
Used to observe the warmup transients .
And all this happened, right?
Yes, and it 1s on the voice tape.
Like Gordo said,
you lmow, what the radar needle did,
What it does is it
has sort of a cyclic thing when you put it in standby
and it 1s ready to run why it sits there and the lock on
52
L
Cooper
Conrad
FCSD REP
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
l ight blinks Green/OFF, Green/OFF.
Lock on light will blink on and it will come out R and
R dot will go from peg to peg.
And they'll settle out
when it really is warmed up good and you've gotten past
the transient periods and they' ll all come back to zero.
I think what they' re looking for are clues to tell you
that the set is warming up correct ly. Ba.ck in the
early days of TACAN we had warmup problems.
In other words, this would be your firnt indication if
something was wrong?
Purge Section.
One and Two.
Well, we got our first load, this 6-4 load.
The first
load that came up over the DCS system and it came up right
over the Cape.
Purge Section.
One and Two .
Got that?
Yes, no. Yes. That' s when we were getting rushed.
Let' s
go back to that.
Let ' s stop right there.
The REP was
supposed to go out at 02 :07 and I purg·ed early and I
always had been purging early because I purged it about
1+50 and then I went through the check off list and they
were all checked off here.
I powered up at 1+50, I
purged the fuel cells and here I checked them off here.
. . . prop gauge experiments and the RAD 1 on and the cold
53
IR on and the power on the exmitter on and the recorder
off and I went through these by the numbers.
Com
puter, we went to Catch-Up . We had the hundred feet
in the window.
We were really getting ready to
put the REP out and right then and there was when we came
over the hill and we were beginning to get to the dark
side you know, and the sun was getting low and that' s
when the scanner started going out,
Cooper
That's when the scanner started dropping out.
Conrad
And we started getting the scanner light and then now,
you got to visualize there ' s part of the problem. We're
coming into this "Fuzzy Zone"-horizon and that is the
best way to describe it.
Cooper
Yeah, you can't see anything.
Conrad
And the spacecraft looks like you're pitched up
tremen
dously when you're zero- zero- zero to begin with and we
both had the impression that the scanner was pitching
us up. Well, that may not have been true. It just
may have been that that's the way the sky got to looking
as we approached the dark side zero- zero- ze
Context
This is one of 40 NASA records in the declassified archive, reported in the United States region. It was published in Release 03 (6/12).
Evidence tiers describe the type of record (sensor capture vs. written report vs.
administrative file) · not a claim about its conclusions. UFO Papers reports only what the documents state.