BAASS Monthly Report, November 2009

1/IIIEIIIIYIEJlllll,ICE ll1'IICEI1,1cEITIIIEI ® Novemtier'2009 Monthly Report November 2009 Report Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS) This lnfom,at1011 Is proprietary and co11fide11tial and ca1111ot be disse111i11ated QC used wfithout prior writteA consent frem the Operating Manager or SAA"SS". PREFACE This Progress report summarizes BAAS$ activities and progress for the period November 1- November 30, 2009. TABLE OF CONTENTS Topics covered in this report are the following: Summary of MU FON Investigative Activity for November 2009 .....................Page 3 Progress on Utah Ranch lnvestigations ............................................................... Page 59 Preliminary Report on a Blue Orb lncident....................................................... Page 126 Conclusion............................................................................................................ Page 154 2 Summary of Cases That MUFON Investigated During November 2009 In February 2009, BAASS executed a Purchase order with MUFON that entitles BAASS to: (a) receive notification of significant reports on UAP sightings from anywhere in the United States within hours, (b) receive timely reports from MUFON investigators regarding investigations of these incidents (c) receive physical evidence (including photographs, digital recordings, samples of soil, insects, plants, and animals) for scientific analysis. BAASS has multiple laboratories that are ready to conduct forensic, photographic, metallurgic, chemical, isotope, biological, chemical analysis of any specimens that BAASS receives from MUFON. It should be noted that during the month of October 2009, BAASS conducted an appraisal of MUFON's performance to date. BAASS was dissatisfied with MUFON's tendency to warehouse significant sums of money every month, especially during the early stages of the contract. Hence, for the remainder of the contract, BAASS will be reducing the monthly stipend to MUFON by $10,000. This will still enable MUFON to operate at normal efficiencies as they spend down the remaining surplus money. The following are selected investigative reports from MUFON deployments during the months of October 2009. 3 MIJF©N ~ Mutual UFONelw0tk Case Report MUFON SIP Deployment Case# 19865 Case Type: Cat 2 i p Person 116 Investigator:.__________________, 1843 3 GPS COORDINATES : 1...._ _(-a)-( _) ________, COORDINATES ACCURACY: Location of witness vehicle on higlnway where sighting occurred. Object was seen 30-50 feet to the East at approx. 25' altitude. LOCATION: Railroad crossing ot843(a)(3) ~odesto, CA DATE OF EVENT: 10-07-09 TIME OF EVENT:20:04:00 ( ) Exact ( x ) Approximate 4 On 10-13-09 a CAT 3 Star team Deployment in Modesto, CA was authorized and !'°AP Person 116 ras assigned as lead investigator. f P Person 59 MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) STAR Team Manager SIP Project Coordinator Background: Two witnesses (father and 6 yr. old daughter) in a rural area first observed and photographed two blue elevated lights in flight approximately a mile away towards town. Witness drove towards objects for better view. Upon arriving at general site, objects converged in flight upon witnesses from left and right to a hovering position viewed from front auto window. Frightened bythe event and belief that objects began following them, witness drove rapidly one half mile into town and a mile beyond where objects were no longer observed. Daughter developed a chest rash the nest day. Narrative: Thursday 10/15/09 17:50 Drove to Modesto, CA and arrived 19:07 at california Highway Patrol at 4030 Kiernan Ave., only to find the office closed. Drove the route that reporting witness took on the night of his sighting to familiarize myself with surroundings, abstractions, lighting, traffic, and details included in his report. s Drove to the church and waited until 20:00 when witness came out of the church. As soon as we met and made Introductions, witness offered to show me his route and stops for different events. We drove south on Tully Road and stopped midway between Kiernan Ave and Bangs Ave where witness took his 3 photos ofthe 2 blue lights with his cell phone looking southeast. (We later discovered the location of the 2 blue lights were very close to the vicinity of the Modesto Hobby and Crafts Store on Bangs Avenue east of Tully Road approximately 3000 feet away from witness's camera shots.) We then drove east on Bangs Avenue and stopped on the east side of the railroad tracks where witness stated, " ... my vehicle was converged on from the fields from the north and south just before the auto dealership on my right. I could see them from my front window a roximatel thlrt to flft feet awa ) with one being above the other'' 1843(a)(3) i;:,43(a) .._________________....... 1 We soon discovered the Modesto Hobby and Crafts Store was on Bangs Avenue approximately 800 feet from the railroad crossing between the tracks and the auto dealership. Hobby store was closed. We continued to travel east on Bangs Avenue past the Modesto Hobby and Crafts Store and auto dealership to the stoplight on McHenry Avenue where we turned right and drove two blocks through Pelandale Avenue where witness's daughter had stated, "Daddy, it is following us". From this location, an illuminated aerial object above the railroad crossing could still be in view at approximately 4400 feet away. We drove one block farther south on McHenry to approach the next stoplight at E. Union Avenue where, on the night of this event, a police car was parked and many workers had been repaving the road. When witness's daughter was asked if she still saw it, she said, "Yes". It is questionable if these other people had also 6 seen these blue lights although approximately 6000 feet from the railroad crossing. By the time we drove another block ("' 1200 feet ) south on McHenry Avenue to Standiford Avenue, witness's daughter had said, "It went away". (Total distance from railroad crossing "'7200 feet) I didn't see any rash on witness's daughter's chest.******* will send me a picture of It. The origin of the rash is unknown, perhaps stress. I did not find any knowledgeable person at the Boyett Gas Service Station in the vicinity to interview. Witness was leaning towards the hobby shop model remote controlled airplane hoax scenario through discussion with friends. Because of this inclination, witness does not want to talk to BAASS or any other third party. I have good working communications now through witness for networking in the Modesto area and I expect to hear from him as he explores his suspicions further with his personal friends and hobby store. IAAP Person 116 MUFON Star Team Investigator With new info from******* below, I listed identity of objects in CMS Report as: IFO-Man-Made Objects. cd ............................................................................................................ 7 New info: From: IAAP Person 117 Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:57 PM To:IAAP Person 124 Hf-AP Person 59 ~AAP Person 103 l!AAP Person 116 Subject: Investigator notes - reevaluating CMS 19865? October 29. 2009 AAP Person Hi I·· 103 ._,--­ I read your report - I concur with Investigators assessment that daughter of witness possibly may have suffered a rash due to stress (frightened). However, perhaps from experience, something did not seem right. I noticed you mentioned a local hobby store in your report. I used to fly RC model planes and thought to check to see if model aircraft were flying the night and location of sighting. Maneuvers of objects in witness report suggested lights could be model planes. After reading investigator report, I contactedDwho answered store phone -1843(a)(2) an employee of 'Modesto Hobby and Crafts' -401 Bangs AVE #H Modesto Ca (209)529-7310 Often local hobby shops are a invaluable source of information on local model flying clubs as well. This store is very near location model flying location of the UFO sighting reported in CMS 19865. 8 http://www.modestohobby.com/ Contacting Store nearby location of sighting .... ••••••• confirmed a number of hobbyists' fly their model gliders at night or early often most evenings. ••••••• also confirmed they all use bright blue colored lights on their gliders to see their models. These models are unpowered gliders (perhaps 'slope gliders'?) ••••••• also confirmed they were flying models matching the maneuvers also ­ the same night and time of UFO sighting October 7,, 2009 (20:00 hours PDT). ••••••• also commented that they get many UFO reports from cars passing in area according to Modesto Police Dept .. The Modesto Police Dept has sometimes shown up at model air field in response to a UFO report phoned into Modesto police according to employee •••••••. Based on this new new information, before approving case - recommend investigator consider reevaluation of case deposition from 'Unknown' to 'IFO: Man Made Object' {RC model gliders with blue lights attached.)? Most Respectfully, IAAP Person 117 Chief Investigator SC October 29, 2009 9 Case Report MUFON SIP Deployment Star Team cat. 3 Case #20143 lnvestlgator:IAAP Person 109 843 2 1843 3 GPS cooRDINATES: 11 _ _ _ _ca_ > ....._ (a-)( )._ )(_-----------1 11843(a)(2). 1843(a)(3) COORDINATES ACCURACY: possible craft landing sight adjacent to witness property LOCATION: Versailles, Mo 11843(a)(2), 1843{a)(3) DATE OF EVENT: Sunday October 25, 2009 TIME OF EVENT: 1:30 AM to 5:30 AM local ( ) Exact ( x) Approximate Duration 4 hours AAP Person 109, ,,• ,•' On 10-26-09 a CAT 3 Star team Deployment In Versailles, MO was authorized and I ·· / AAP P:rso~.. j .. -·· ... !was assigned as lead Investigator~ . _lMissouri MUFON) Assistant State 109 Director accompanied her and assisted with the investigatiori-----.......•--AAP Person 11 8 ­ jAAP Person 59 l MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) STAR Team Manager SIP Project Coordinator Background: ••••••••: witness goes by****** 10 The witness******* saw a large craft land in the woods through his bedroom window at approximately 1:30 AM the morning of Oct. 25, 2009. He and his wife watched it through the window for between 15 and 30 minutes before he decided to go outside for a better view. When ******* went outside he noticed that there were also several small objects much closer, low in the woods. He went into the house, woke his eleven year old son, grabbed binoculars and they both went outside to get a closer look. The two of them saw the large craft deep in the woods which was an upright triangle shape with several different color lights; silver, green, blue, orange, and red all flashing. In the woods much lower, were three "saucer" shaped orange/red lights which were in a field to the west. Two of these were in the woods below the far neighbors dusk to dawns and the third even lower being seen by******* and his son while on their knees on the back deck of their home. Farther to the left of their deck (west), they spotted 3 more orange/red lights in the woods and a little farther to the left one blue light that briefly flashed for a total of seven lights, not counting the craft. These light were small and spinning and so bright that they were visible even without the binoculars. After about an hour, the lights changed from saucer shaped to round and began spinning in a different manor. They were now the shape and size of a soccer ball having compressed but not more than half their original size. The lights still proceeded to flash orange/red brighter and dimmer and move slowly about the woods as they spun. The large craft stayed stationary. This was all in the woods behind the family's home the craft being directly north and the lights being south/west of the craft. After hiking with******* through the woods and finding the spot, we determined by using my range finder that the large craft had landed .7 miles behind *******'s house in the direction directly north. After an hour or so of viewing the craft and the lights, * **** noticed a figure of what he thought was a person standing on the ridge behind the house much closer than the craft or lights. (He noticed this because a deer ran close by across the woods in front of him snorting.) The being was determined to be about five feet tall and wearing something horizontally striped, that was black and white and loose fitting like a down jacket. The being was holding something in his/its left hand and had it up to its mouth like he was talking into it. There was also what looked like a back-pack placed on the ground in front of the being at its feet. ******* described the figure's face and hands as being white in color. He was looking through binoculars and wasn't sure if it was skin he was seeing or some type of mask. After measuring the area and viewing the video tape that I took of the area, we determined the being to be standing about 50 yards from the back of 11 their home. I asked******* what he did when he saw the being, and he said that he told his son to run in the house which his son did. ******* said that he stared at the being through binoculars for several minutes seeming to be "staring each other out". I asked him when, why, and how did this end. The reply was that he got tired and decided to go inside the house. ******* then described watching the craft through the bedroom window falling asleep and re-awaking to watch periodically until about 5:30AM when he woke to check for the last time and the craft was gone. He thought that he was only asleep for about 15-20 minutes but missed the craft leaving the woods. Investigation Report: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:30PM 11'f: Person ~issouri MUFON Assistant State Director, who was assisting me on this case, interviewed the other witnesses who were *******'s wife, and two sons. I hiked into the wood with ******* in an attempt to find some trace evidence of the landing sight. The sight was due north .7 miles from the back of *******'s home as we determined later with my range finder. We walked through the woods to a ridge which we suspected to be where the being was standing the night of the sighting. We came to this conclusion because this was the only place in the area in question where the being would be visible as close as he/it was seen from the back deck of ****** 's home. This area was about 50 yards away. When we reached this ridge, I noticed a chipmunk on a small tree and a few feet away a turtle. Both were alive and very close to where the being 1843(a)(2) stood;-·-**j)k~**'-s-du~ho we took with us to determine if there was any animal reaction, sat in this sQot with no remorse. But, when we hiked down the 1843(a)(2) .... ridge -st:le-refusecl to follow. EJmade her way west staying on the ridge but watching us cross the woods. We hiked down through rough terrain, up another ridge, across a small creek, and across more rough terrain. Even though this area was fairly flat with some trees down, ******* determined that this couldn't be the spot because he couldn't see his house. We made our way up another ridge and down, across a barbed wire fence, up and over another ridge to another flat area deep in the woods. From this point we could see the back of *******'s home through binoculars and he determined that this was the right distance away into the woods. We hiked around carefully not disturbing any possible foot prints, tracts, etc. I notice an area with small bare spots but this was as obvious wash off from a ridge farther north. Further to the west of this area I noticed 12 broken trees. Some were old breaks but several were new broken limbs and small uprooted trees. I also came across an uncharacteristic bare area which I measured to be 6 toot 6 inches, by 7 foot 6 inches square. There were heavy leaves covering the entire area except for this one spot which was bare except for a few leaves which had blown over it. I took a reading with my Geiger counter and EMF meter but nothing registered. To the north edge of this bare area I could see pushed over dirt like it was cleanly scraped from the surface taking all the grass and leaves with it. The dirt area left wasn't dug in where I could make a mold, but seemed to me to be raised a bit over the rest of the area terrain. I collected a dirt sample from the center of this area, and a sample from the area that was pushed up. I also took a compass reading of the area as reference noticing that was my compass was off. I lined myself up to the house directly as I had done before we left and it read 40 degrees off to the east instead of due north as it should have. I walked east about thirty feet and took another reading which was 20 degrees off to the east, then back to the spot which again was 40 degrees off. I teach underwater navigation so I know how to use a compass and this was definitely off. The compass read 40 degrees off even when I walked thirty feet to the west of the patch of dirt which I will assume at this point could be the possible landing sight. Around this area (in about a 25 foot ratio) were small raised areas in the ground as well. These ranged from football size to twice that size. These areas looked like mole mounds but much bigger. Most of them were raised up with brown dirt, but two of them had a strange orangish clay color. I took dirt samples of these as well. Another strange effect was *******'s dogD First she sat where.the 1843(a)(2) unidentified being stood, next she refused to cross the terrain with******* and me but made her way around to the west of us, and finally her last reaction to the area. ******* had been carrying my Star Team bag for me. (He was a real gentleman and insisted). When he lay the bag down on sight, I eventually moved it close to the bare spot I was documenting. O came over to it and l.ay down 1843(a)(2) next to the bag not budging until we left the sight. The bag had *******'s scent on it and it seemed like she was using it as a safe place. After documenting the possible craft landing sight, we traveled southwest towards the areas where the balls of light were seen. About 75 feet from the primary sight I spotted two mysteries holes. They were side by side, and exactly 1 foot 6 inches apart. These holes were around 10 inches deep with a narrow hole­ area at an angle at the bottom. At first I thought they were snake holes, so I cleared off the leaves and noticed that the hole at the bottom ended. These two 13 matching holes were 1 ft 4 in. X 1 ft 4 in. round at the top each being the same. took pictures as documentation. At this time we were at about 5:30PM and loosing light. We still had two more sights to get to before dark and several inches of rain moving in the next day so we moved on. ******* took me to another sight which was a large grassy area. This is where he suspected that three of the balls of light were. All we saw were horse shoe tracts, deer tracks and dung. We hiked to the next area where we were met with an electric fence. This is where he saw the other three orange/red balls of light and the one brief blue one. At the far end of the field we noticed another square bare area. I took pictures and video for reference. Upon viewing the video I noticed that this area was nothing like the sight found before, but an area where the rancher places hay for his horses/cattle. The area in question we covered was a minimum½ mile wide, and .7 miles from the witness's home. Because of this, no out of area dirt samples were possible. ******* also told me about an occurrence on Monday night Oct. 26, 2009 at about 1:30 AM (technically Oct. 2ih.) ******* was out watching the night sky, for obvious reasons, when he saw 2 military jets flying grids across the sky. He watched them from 1:30 AM to 2:30/3:00 AM. They were flying search pattern grids and dropped 3 flares lighting the sky. He said that the flares were dropped at different times to keep the sky lit. Because of the fog that night the sky/woods seemed to almost glow blue with the orange flares. ******* told me that if they were searching for the craft they were searching too far southwest. ********: Interview 6:30 to 7:00 PM Oct. 28, 2009 ~: P~-~~()~ -l - ---- lwas able to recover******* and I via cell phone contact½ mile away west of *******'s house. (We got lost a bit) I took the opportunity to interview *******'s neighbor on the way back. *******is *******'s neighbor who is located about 10 acres to the west of *******. On the night of Oct. 26, 2009 ******* noticed 4 F-111 jets out of Whiteman Air Field going about 80 knots and running cross-stagger grids. ******* has a good description of the activity because he was a Marine Air-Wing for seven years. He remembers that it was just before his wife came home from work at 11:00 PM. Prior to this he witnessed 2 military helicopters circling the area for just a few minutes. He described the grids as being close proximity with 14 low slow flight. He only watched them for a few minutes but heard them for quite some time. I asked him if this was usual activity and he said that he had only seen this one time before about 8 months ago. He has seen military maneuvers practiced over head but the last was during the day 3 months prior with dog-fight activity and flying high altitude. Whiteman Air Field is about an hour drive away but just a few minutes fly time by jet. ••••••• didn't see the jets drop flares or the helicopter shine a search light. If these were in fact military helicopters, their night vision/heat sensors would rule out the need for a search light. ******* hadn't seen any strange lights in the past few weeks or prior, but had heard deer running and snorting late night over the past few days. One of his dogs has also been bedding down close to a tree starting at dusk the last few nights and not moving until dawn. He said that the dog was fine during the day, not sickly, eating as usual, but strangely skittish at night. '{;': P~rson_I I******* and I got back to *******'s house just about dark. Before we could get set up for night observing of the area we had a strange light appear in AAP Person the northern sky. I lgot a few still shots and I got some night vision video. 118 • • The light remained stationary for several minutes then seemed to slowly set in the northern sky, shifting east a few degrees, then disappearing and reappearing more to the west. Terrestrial activity rises in the east and sets in the west. Stars don't set in the north, shifting position in the sky or disappearing and reappearing. This went on for more than an hour. We also had other strange streaks and balls of light cross the northern sky and my night vision picked up a couple of strange effects including one wide white streak. Further analysis of our video and still pictures is pending. NOTE: Lake of the Ozarks is only 10 miles south of this location. Conclusion: Unknown UAV, Entity, and Landing Sight. CAT. 3 *Video and still shot documentation of sight and witnesses * 4 soil samples taken 15 .. •lq I 1\,-,'~ ,, /,1,.Al.f' '/ ' , . I I ..-, I ~ Drawings I'-· I • f s .. Ill (- r)/o. • • f.• ~ I "1 \ ,I c,.l I .. W1 \, I... ~~i,1 l.;i ,,, ) Drawings \l\)t.rt~ d.1- t•Jr-l I .la Case Report MUFON SIP Deployment CASE# CASE TYPE: CAT 2 ► 20595 - Santo ► 20598 - Stephenville ► 20610 -Hico ► 20616 - Hico ► 20618- De Leon ► 20629 - Dublin ► 20660 - Breckenridge ► More cases will be added to this list as the witnesses file them. (20806 just added- no workup yet) On November 24, 2009, 6, cases were combined into one SIP call.All calls invol\led lights-in-the-sky that resembled golf-to-dime- size lights {a1 arm's length}. These calls were located in the central Texas area as indicated by the town names above. 119 INVESTIGATOR:r ....~_P_P_er_so_n _________________, GPS COORDINATES : 1843(a)(3) ► 20595- Santo ► 20598 - Steohenville ► 20610-Hico ► 20616-Hico ► 20618 - De Leon ► 20629 - Dublin ► 20660 - Breckenrldae COORDINATES ACCURACY:_Coordinates are accurate according to witness descriptions and Google Earth. LOCATION: CITY, STATE COUNTY: All in Texas - Santo-PALO PINTOCOUNTY; Stephenvil~-ERATH COUNTY; Hico - HAMILTON COUNTY{2); De Leon- COMANCHE COUNTY; Dublin - ERATH COUNTY; Breckenridge- STEPHENS COUNTY. Others can be added later. No time on this report. DATE OF EVENT: November 18,2009 18 · · 119 TIME OF EVENT: LOCAL ( ) EXACT (X) APPROXIMATE vember 24, 2009, a CAT (2) Star t eam Deployment In TeKas was authorizedl...___ ··_. ... ·········_··· ····1AAP Person MP Person . . . .1,9 .. ........... was assigned as lead investigator. !MP Person 59 l MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) STAR Team Manager SIP Project Coordinator BACKGROUND: Many central Texas residents were Witness to asudden light show by an object, or objects unknown. Over a period ofnearly 1hrand 5minutes,extremely high-intensity lights came on, off, and on for a second or two and thenwent off.These lights seem to be inastraight line with the whole light array moving to another location close by and coming on again. The earliest sighting was 19:00 with the latest reported 20:05.Other witnesses said there were,4smaller lights with the larger lights. These numbered anywhere from 0-4. INVESTIGATOR NARRATIVE: Witness comments inblack and Investigator comments In red­ 20595 - Santo Atapproximately 19:33, 2 miles west of Santo TX, Iwas in the process of feeding my dogs when I noticed out of the comer of eye a (flash) bright light. I stopped to look (190• SSW) and the bright light began to dim, then immediately a second light Illuminated for one second, then athird for one second and thenafourth. After the fourth illumination. I 53.W 4tiny white dots moving very slowly across the sky and within asecond or two allthe lights dlStJ.ppeared. They reappeared in almost the same area, in the same pattern and it happened again for atotal of 3cycles. They were approximately 200ft AGL, 2miles from ourhome. The Interstate is amile from home and the sighting about a mile further on. Tlhese lights were very slow moving. Using the 1-20 hwy as comparisonof 70-75 MPH,these lights were going about 30 MPH headingESE.At junction of FM 4, objects turned more to SSE. (there is another witness according to this witness who also saw the object at this time}.The colors were a white ( yellowish orange) that seem tochange colors and almost flicker. Icannot help but see some controlling factor in these actions. The difference here seems to be aflicker ingof the li~hts and4llghts.Witness is apilot, works forl1843(a)(2) jgave extremely accurate descriptions andwas the best witness. 19 Witness said all the lights were a bright white, but his wife said they were more orangy. Witness indicated that trucks on the Interstate are app 4" long to his sight, and this object was 10-12" long. He estimated that the object was approximately 200' long. There may be others calls on this generated by his friend and co-workers. This witness said when the lights would come on, they were like explosions. No sound,just abright flash as they came on.Witness also Indicated that he did not here any jets at that time or later. 1843(a)(2) Figure 1 (20S95) Graphic by witness In Santo 20 1843{a){3) Figure 2 (20595) Orange block indicates an object at the place of the Santo sighting 20M-Stephenylle Iwas~ homeflom my in-Ins holawho liveIn ..Greenscnekna between Stlphenville and Dubin but mm near IM>llrl wllh my blyes old and 12Wll9kold In the car wllh 1111. HW11 nat long after Itumad alfof Coooty Road 242 which Ihad been,-- nor11. on ID amher00ll1ly road, Iba1ie¥e II la Colllt, fad 381 haallng south east. Itwas not ~ allsI ti.medcno Q>unty Road 381 11111 ralcld,two bright lights lo ltasky. 0utr1tt1ea mn my wild8t1leld ...,,mrl!ftw IIQtJllY ,._ MVinllaf 'M1PD was lhal m MDPlnll, lhlv Wll8 orangish in color ll]dltlay wnapartblJ K IllcMed down and leaned bW8ld in my 1811 IIO irMlllgal9 w11a11was1111Rg. l100n,...tleJW118■t>c>IIJl1Qap1an1Ma101tasoonas 1 cana1plhll1taima anottwM Pftrd P4l)d tp 1b9 IID9'b lkft on my rbbtaod lllfl fQlQJac IQbt IQMlld abcM b nr« lk# n1Q 11 !ilbminq • DbWJl b •allpyl•ffMB•• The IJNs WIii stationary In twlky or,ynpi)a.At1ht newllgbla 1111181d I started fleakilg out. /w you wall know UFO 8"'11osa piwaleltlncuneand IClOlil notbellM that Ic:md be pmaibl'f wll'IIINing It t>r mpelf. Prob1b1v I . Otce Iha 98COQd M h nay ldJl!1ffll'ldlharfadat! teimiwlb tho blmton my 11ft n bothev wndl rolJ1iDlalllv oo the left sla1edlo show up Idid oot as midi allelb ID ht oo the fll' right. 21 Ido not bellMItchanged tu do not f8C8II when for sure tt faded alhough I know ft was within 8IOOndl of the other ~his. In all the event lD0k pa In probably a la) 2minutes. The 1hought of the UFO avhtfl9S did not oocurred 10 me•h tllid ard fourth~IPJllll8d but I was really Iha manner 1hat the llghts faded that convinced me that Ihad just witnes8ed lllnll:..,hl,nn Iwas very edad n ahockad about what I had juat seen and got on lhe phone to ahare it Mth my husband lmmedllllely. My ~ng call1D mn want 7:44 P.M. Therefore Iapproximate the slghti~ klok place at 7:42 PJ~.J just rec:eiYed W0fd wla Fabook that afriend d mine also wlne8sed lgta In the sky 1h11 twining although Ido not know the specfflcs oftheirslg~. According to the Clark Flek:I Municipal Airfield Manager, another man had told him of 3helicopters off hwy 377 between Dublin and Stephenville in alrfangulation and range finding exercise aweek or two before the 25111 This area does correspond to lhe location of some of the sightings, Wilh the dales of the sightings being on the 18111, that lands exacUy 1week to the day of the sightings. He indicated that the high-intensity lights were not orange, but white, Red and green navigation lights were also visible This does notagree with afew other witnesses, but lhey may have been too far from them to see navigation lights . I will make note of the fact here that aircraft do not have to run with lights while In the Brownwood MOA's. Of note, Clark field has no radios and no radar. Consideration was given to the possibility of the Helicopters com111g from Ft. Hood, Dyess orcarswell figure 3 Brownwood 1 East MOA is over most of the sighting area and close to the rest. It might be noted that flight mutes and power transmission lines are in the Jrea. 22 Figure 4 (20598) sighting line was judged to be 156 degrees by measurement. l 1843(a)(3) Figure 5 (20598) Line of sight Intersects with one yellow target on the timellne and is very close to an orange target at 01:45:32 (GMT 19 th ) 23 On aradar image out of OFW, (F19ure 6) given the distance. the orange image below the blue sighting line indicates lhat this object was between 4000 and 6000 ft above ground Hard targets In red-orange west were 1n Brown county headed east at or above 10000 ft To be that far away and that h19h eliminates most, 1f not all ground clutter, birds, bugs, etc. The large yellow target also Indicates asolid target It is also important to realize that the call lo witness's husband was made at 7:44 pm ano she guessed the time of sighting at 7:42 pm. I believe this all falls within the limes of the radar image. Video of the radar sighting eve[)' 10 minutes showed lhat the traffic In the lower left of Figure6. (red and orange) was moving In an eastward direction Addltlonal radar searching Is needed lo finish this. 1843(8)(3) ,,,...........,................ ... ., Figure 6 (20598) Radar Image out of Ft. Worth at 01:45:32 (GMT 19 th ) 24 20610-Hico ~6P:r.~~-~ .R~PQrt wastaken..by.Mufon_Dispatcll,1-l -­ 3 -6liqhts In astraight line flashing.objects were along distance away the size of this was monstrous, IT lights were connected tone object this is true. Witness was off highway 6, Between Rising Star and Comanche The lights were very bright orange, jets were chasing objects and alot smaller than this obj~ viewed for 45 sec lo a minute. afriend saw the object in Abilene, 30 min poor to this sighti 7witnesses in Stephenville , Afriend who is apolice officer has adashboard video (dashboard deo Is of the 2008 sigh ings) but does not in anyway what his name used. Witness has pictures and video and can get pictures and videos from other witnesses. lnves • ator has seen photos and is (lying to get co . Witness !so reported that there ere 4iets 1n the area some m,nu!es after the sighting. He indicated that he was tn a large pickup that nigh.I and it seemed ry small in comparison to Iha ex1remely large objec . These distance-judging episodes at night are notoriously hard oaccurately portray. 25 () 0 0 C) () I I , ' l Figure 7 (20610) Hand drawing provlclecl by witness. Witness Indicated that he thought t here were darker areas between the lights signifying an ext remely large object. I think unlighted area next to lights would look that way at night. No proof hore of an object. 26 Figure 8 (20610) Witnesses line of sight (begins NW of Comanche 10 miles) led his view across Lake Proctor toward area of other sightings and is itself well into the Brownwood Military Operating Area as shown. 20616- Hico ibegin in saying that this is not an unordinary event as we see these lights every once in a while outside in our yard .we live way out in the country 8miles out from a town so at night it is quite easy lo see anything in the night sky. We never have reported these sightings as alot of people do around here as we live 8miles from Stephenville TX and 10 or so miles from Dublin Texas. but last night we saw the lights at the same level in the sky .(direction and level not available at this time).id say at~of these. It was around dinner time soi was in the kitchen at first and since the lights had been seen lately we had been looking outside once in a while at night. My husband and i walked out and were only out for a minute and then we saw them...i guess thatwas a lucky thing. I didn't have to wonderwhat it was since these lights have been seen here off and on for gutte a while now...guess they like the dairies around this area of teas.The rather rourd orange lights (that look almost all the same size)just last afew seconds then they disappear. 27 Of course your real excited when we are seeing these lights.. and then they are gone (maybe not really gone,just change position so we can no longer see them).. almost always afterwards we see the blinking of jets and hear the jets coming in the area. Have not reached this witness and have no reply to email.. Since we had had some news only acouple of weeks ago about the unexplained lights again in the Stephenville paper people in this area start looking around at night again to see UFOs. Actually we had seen the lights last October and were waiting for this October to look again ..but itwas cloudy most of the month. Now it is November and we saw them last night. More to come in this section-­ Figure 9 (Z061611843(a)(2) Iof Lights In the Texas Sky pulled the MUFON report off CMS and created a drawing based on the sighting report. 28 . 1843(a)(2) . 20818-Qt Leon My mohrand Iwt laM!g Da Leon Texasm twwy 6n jull pmthe Leon river bridge In Ille cleari1g I happen to see ...up IDIIBY-Ml laokld I111811411111d lgtJll pa MPiU b lca,.,pQl;IJIIIll whit& lo mum b1glllll Ml emteetor And amoment laltrthn w MOlherrmto the lift ofthe flllt. The one on the~d~ and ttlelaft applald. Andfora brlaf momanttheywnlogllhar.lhan1hly boll Wll'lgone.They wn large in Size and dd notto..,._-,bewiy hlfl '1 elevation. Fl'QIII hlgh!!Y 6lwf ware~ tam matDwards Confine, Lake PnldDr...o.r norlrNtllDublLSbangeetttlln;my.ffdlerf:_Jand I hMever seen.Orqaffthlt8 lqJls ID aMQi stajpht b ID 4MthenfllCDQd lghlltboWJO .181hand tdtthor Wtr:f the Iii 2n#JOWD, tmastgatot calculated from wlness deeatptiQn ofvmual through acarfront wi"ldshield that the object was 30 degrees off the oortzon lhtwftnaaga,,aagues., of SE as 1h11 cirec:lkJn d ht--.From lt1ll eight, ua~ witness diedlone. lnY881gator plollad dle ckV988d Iha slghllng at SA> 140deglaes. There are red lghls on wnl turbines tothe North with helWy air1rafflc ii atd outofOFW. Of note, lhere are 2 rows d hlgh-W>lage l)OWBf' InesJust south of Lake Proctor.This Itjust off hwy m lnvesligalof spent soma 30 mutas at 1185118 on Tuesday niJhl November 24", 2009 at the same apptDanaltfimeas lhelllGflllng forcompnliYeP'fpoaeland t>shootdlracllcns. The S'9nttng was In aLO.S.difectly cNer the "ghost town• ofCOMYN \ffllch lscff FM 1496. Wltnas8 also said that the lights came on in a11ast1• as did the Sri>wllness figure 10 (20618) LO.S. at 177 degrees 29 r ■ - r T 20629 - Dublin r • I ,. I was drtving home from De Leon Texas toward 0ublin.... Was about 5miles out of Deleon...when 4or 5very bright circles appeared In the sky.... 3large and 2smaller....lt appeared that the smaller ones moved toward the large one like achild to its mother,very very fast then they shot upward what looked like they disappeared behind the clouds . Part of this statement about .clouds does not match the other witness statements or the weather bureau. Further checks will be made later. Also, this is one of lhe statements in which the lights move quickly. Others suggest differently. Witness said it was nearly dark which falls into line wi(h the other statements. None of this lasted very long....Llghts were very brtght nothing else was In the sky....l had no Idea what these were, but I knew they were not jets, Jets do not move that fast. .. Did not mention this to anyone but Idid see where acouple my age noticed the same thing.... 4or 6bright circles ; West of Dublin.. I I - ,. - • I -f Picture shows five lights...2large and 3small ones. The followi11g from an email:• Isaw 5objects (clroles) 2the size of golf balls and 3 the size of adime one large one and 3small ones where In aline with one large one at the rear but upward about what looked like maybe 8to 10 feet. . A check with the Dublin police department did no[ show any 'lights" call on !hat day or the next. Alater visit to the newspaper office uncovered s~tl article about another sighting on that night. This coincides with the other sightings. The article also indicated 4-6 orange balls1usl East and Soulh" of town. Sighting lasted avery short time and there was no noise. Wllness Indicated that there were els in the vicmit , The first witness in this case Is retired from the Air Force and 1843 a 2 30 ... j J • , ., .., ' ,. ... Figure 11 (20629) Sighting l ights Hand drawn by witness 31 "t-1__11_,____., COMPOS !TE P EF. 2• 8NM KOYX • Ol'fSS ~f&, TX 1843{a)(3) [:~ ~~= flf~ MOOE, VCP: & I Jl Ltotlld: cfBZ (Ctttoorv) ... 2, (1$) t- 24 {14 ) ,._ 20 (ll) + 16 (IZ) • 12 (11) +. (10) ♦ 4 (9) 0 (I ) • ~ (7) • • (6) • 1: 15) • 16 "! • 20 3 • 24 (2 ) • 28 (1) Figure 12. (20629) Dyess long-range composite for 01:07:40 GMT-Yellow block Is In line NE,£ from witness position. 32 Figure 13 (20629) "Mystery Lights" article refer to the same sighting by another witness Figure 14 The (20629) sighting was in the NNE direction at app 30 degree 20660- Breckenridge This witness described the light in the following: 2009-11-18 20:05:00 was at my home, which is East of Breckenridge. I noticed what I thought was acommercial jet flying East to west in same flight path as an earlier plane but noticed the lights did not disappear (flash), like navigational lights. V66 is the commercial air route visible from witness location. "Visual routes are used by the Department of Defense and associated Reserve and Alr Guard units for the purpose of conducting low altitude navigation and tactical training under VFR below 10,000 ft MSL at airspeeds in excess of 250 knots IAS".(fAA Special Use Airspace &Air Traffic Controlled Assigned Alrsp<£e website) These lights pulsed in sequence. I got my binoculars and saw 4amber (orange/white) colored lights in arow, with what appeared to be asmaller light on the bottom of the object near the leading end. The smaller light would flash reel, then 33 white. As brightly lit as the object was, Istill could not make out aruselage, tail. or wings. If it were acommercial or military Jet, I should seen an outline and would have heard the sound ofJet engines, however, there was complete silence. If It had been ahelicopter, Idoubt l would have heard it(too high. too far away), and at that distance l would have barely seen it if at all. I ruled out jet aircraft and helicopter. The object appeared to be at an altitude of about 10,000 feet and perhaps 20 miles from my location.By my estimate, it was traveling in the vicfnity of 1-20, heading west. When I first saw the object, it was in the direction of Morgan Mill, TX, which is to my SE. Al it's closest, the object was probably slightly north of Cisco,TX. I lost sight of object when It simply disappeared In the direction of Baird, TX. Observation lasted approx. 2minutes. Figure 15 (20660) Breckenridge Is between to flight routes. 34 l. Figure 16 (20660) Light In the Tel(as Sky depiction oflights track Figure 17 (20660) Depiction of sighting by p843(a)(2) !of Lights in the Te><as Sky OBJECT DESCRIPTION: seevanouscasefilesabove 35 EVIDENCE: Back in October this newspaper article came up and seems to describe some of the same type of "lights• activity that would be seen amonth later. Such repetitious activity suggest amilitary influence and control... They're baaaack (again) Unidentified lights reappear in Erath Area residents are once again reporting strange lights in the sky above Erath County, and much like the reports that flooded in rollowing awidespread sighting in January 2008, witne es say the amber glowing orbs are like nothing they've seen before. In the most recent unexplained ighting, a Hamilton County businessman was greeted by the lights as he left ameeting. Jerry McAdam , publisher or the Hico News Review and Hico ISO school board member, said he was leaving aboard meeting Monday with arellow board member when they aw lwo amber lights, which w re level with each other and seemed 10 hover In the sky. 'They (the lights) were low in the ky and disappeared in about five seconds," McAdams said. 'Then lwo more appeared,closer together.' He said the lights disappeared several times and reappeared seconds later Each time the lights were the same amber color, and appeared at different heights and varying distances apart. McAdams said the lights did not move when they were visible or blink. He also said the lights were not like those typically associated with aircraft. 'They were not red,green or while. They did not Hash like on an airplane,• he said. 'There was no motion. Each time they appeared, they were further to the left. I would say they came and went in three cycles.• McAdams said he could not determine the distance of the lights from his Hamilton County vantage poln but said the lights were to the west, In the direction of Dubl n, in the southwest portion of Erath County. ·1 have never seen anything Ilka that before." McAdams sad. "But I do believe what Isaw was like previous {reported) sightings.' Two Dublin area neighbors, who asked to remain anonymous, were in their homes when the men walked out and saw •a11 klnds of lights, all across the sky" Monday. The men captured what they saw on acell p one. The grainy recording offers a glimpse of an amber light that appears in the sky several times, and captures the excitement of the group. One of the men said they first saw asingle ball of hghl, 'not hke a Rashhght or aircraft,' which suddenly spawned several other lights. •11 was llke the lights were coming off the first ball (of light) we saw,' the man said."And they kepi coming, one after another, and moved in every direction ' The man said the lights were white and amber and the whole spectacle lasted alittle more than aminute. He said no sound was associated with the sighting, until jets rushed toward the display. He also said he is not ready to say he saw an alien aircraft, but does believe theunidentified lights were Impressive. 'I don't know what It was, but whatever the lights were, they were truly awesome." he said. Copyright Cl 2009- Stephenvle Emi-e-Tribune •StepherMJe, TX 36 There were reader comment online about the article which give a little insight into how difficult it is for multiple witnesses to accurately describe an object when seeing the same thing. RNderCommera The r~n COO'ffll11I from the IUdlr5 In nowry cb ~ 1'8Jlfe&enl lhe \'IN of empretllbJne com •-•:ndDNWlde on Ocl 21, 200911.57 AM •They NI..,_,S.hmjlllt at ol ConnM Crully.Six F16'1 on 11111NM111(tqlplng 111191.• UlLWRll9 on Od'22 2009 12:53 AM • F18'1englnelCIII be llln-ry-~ E'llnf!llffl jlllt!)Ill1t1e Sald0n cut dfup OIi I hll )'OU can hNrl'le 1nll111gong lhough --··-C«III upwllllacraftWI hM dolngllll lhll cant nm nalleand I'll buy you skit, 111111 lllen Mr dalatpli0nl and ,ocn JUII don't aid up. ET(Empn Trtbllle• •) lhey llMfllft.l.Ol. ' ... W J/11lleon Ocl 22. 2009 9 30 AM. 'Goll 1V11wlll dbinglllm- wt.I 111111 llldllatp!lcn hl.."8lllltlhlng Ilhol9'l abaul Al far the 10111d, IUrt )'OU can hat.e trlillftomlll 5eldlrlCUMll...lrl(J.llt I dlltlllCI butlrl It FWf/t lllelMll llllludl. Pins wll be ffllCh hlpr, MCI lll0ltlikely ffllCh ftr1lw N8/ IO )'OU dDn't..118C8118f11y llar lllln. • ..........lfflla 1111 Ocl 22. 200912.30 PM "I fDr;al tolWIIOfl I.. In c.m.dlllOwlllfl IIIJ• llty wnp!a)lbly ICl'IIIMWlll'OUd Oulllln.Tl-, _.lillraly i.tng up the lklel. SIii F18'1.S.fllm...!Ud118m...MINllll8rndlop .._ So La. ma,t,e jull rneybewhll )'OU IN..101,181hl119 dlrnnt. They n iflWI ...• 11111 lllclawaelt No UfO'Ih8rt),If jell MCI.... • UlL wrole on Oct 22. 2009 11 35 PM •Yep, 1va1111t.....,can llflc:t hows llll'J1111'91can tit head••llldfftlm Hico to Dulllln or Hlffllltcfl you wouldn't hanullu tobdlllra.lllMl~good-ofllltDIMllklllnow,~IIMnMl'_.lfl'/dllllltllP()llldllt'IIIII. 11111 ....of8IIU'llt ~lllllCIMCl118._,.....,alllnll,F18'1, h8lacqlllrl, ll8altlbomblll and Ill lb. It would be niOtb knowmi:ly_ll_lllflnldll,bullllllhllUIUllynMr~ln11111ine.' Nllw2Nlfflllon 0d26,20099.53AM ·111111. _,.,,_WRlllon0d 26 200912'47PM •Anmlng 1111111111112peapltari .....111111 NClllllng lllliemctarnelml l!ld hM 2cllfnntecplwllonltorwhalthey-. • b. I 7 SWl'DIICII OCI 27. 2009 1·32 PM· 'Didan,a.hlppa,to•lllellfihtllglltclcato:J1710'MldFWIIOIIIICl1henadtllel'Oldlldepalllnlllleoldt.nlhlltalleftaa en Illefnlrtd II? 0dGber 1G, abcu 5:45 AM.ft_. not h Ille but lobe IIOUlld ne ' IMI. • 37 EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE: PHYSICAL EVIDENCE: none WITNESS'S INTERVIEW: Refer to case files above FINDINGS OF THIS REPORT: A case for the 3 helicopters and arrays: A Case for Jets and flares: A Case for TR-3B: A case for the unknown: Figure 18 (General Reference) photo- Lines of Sights from witness intersect suggesting apossible flight path of the object/light. Case Report MUFON SIP Deployment Case# 20706 CAT 2 MUFON Deployment Investigators: IAAP Person 103 IAAP Person 104 1843(a)(3) GPS COORDINATES : COORDINATES ACCURACY: Exact, coordinates taken with GPS at effected area of event on Highway Location: Port Jervis, NY objected headed towards Unionville DATE OF EVENT: 11/25/09 TIME OF EVENT: 12:15 AM Local ( ) Exact ( X ) Approximate 39 On November 25, 2009 , a STAR team CAT 2 Deployment was activated on Case #20706 in Port Jervis NY. STAR Team lnvestigatofAP Person 103 lwas assigned as AAP Person - lead~nvestw-at-o·r· ·- is the Chief Technical Advisor for STAR Team. 103 ' I:> lnvestigato AAP Pe,rson 104 was secondary investigator.I .. ----!was-State........-.....~:-Person Coordinator. IAAP Person 59 MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) STAR Team Manager SIP Project Coordinator Background: The primary Witness is a 41-year old male. The Witness is a mental health professional and work~1843(a)(2) 1- He is married and lives with his wife at an undisclosed location in Port Jervis, NY. Investigators found t his witness to be highly credible. He was still visibly shaken from his encounter. Witness was very concerned about maintaining his anonymity in regards to this sighting report. He refused to sign a third party release form when asked by investigators. The Witness did allow Investigators to Video tape the interview at his home, but requested the camera be pointed at the floor to protect his identity. Investigators also Videotaped the interview at the affected area along the road side, as witnessed pointed out the details of the event. 40 Witness Narrative: CMS Sighting Report) I left work at 12am as I work 4pm till 12am, I work in 1843(a)(2) which is approx 15 minutes from port Jervis where I live, the quickest route is to take the Minisink turnpike then to the Greenville turnpike, I was driving on the Minisink turnpike when I noticed lights in the sky, firstly I thought it was a plane then I noticed it had 5 lights on itfrom end to end the lights wentfrom blue-white-red-white-blue in that order but the strangest thing was it was turning clockwise slowly and the only sound I could hear was like a cat purring, I slowed the car down to around 20 mph to get a better look then I noticed the size it must ofbeen around 200 feet in length, I proceeded to speed up as I started to get nervous but as it passed over the car the car turned off I came to a stop and grab1bed my cell phone and noticed that had turned off too, by this time I didn't know whether to get out of the car and run or stay in my car before I came to the decision the lights had gone out and the car started up I put myfoot down a sped up the road not looking back I tell you it was the most unnerving things to happen to me. Investigator Report: Investigators left Bowling Green, VA at about 1:30 p.m. on 11/26/09, arriving at Port Jervis, NY at 8:30 p.m. Investigators met with the witness at his home on 11/27/09 at 10:15 a.m. The witness. worksl1843(a)(2) 1- He leaves work around midnight and it takes approximately 15 minutes to get home. He takes a route which goes through a rural area with curving roads. He said that he was "semi-tired but not tired enough to blank out." He was playing Christmas CDs on the radio and singing as he drove. He drove through Unionville up to the Minisink Turnpike. Coming around a bend in the road, he could see an object about a mile away - it looked pretty small. As he came to the next turn, he slowed down to about 25 miles to get a better look at it, then it was almost on top of him and he doesn't understand how it crossed the distance from where he first saw it to where he was in such a short time. He stopped his vehicle along the side of the road and remembers putting the car in PARK, with the engine running. He could now also see that it 41 looked cigar-shaped and was turning clockwise slowly (on axis) as it came towards him. He described the speed as slow like a hot air balloon. When asked to compare the size of the object to an aspirin at arm's length, the witness said that it would be about the size of a baseball. According to the witness description, there were lights (blue, white, red, white and blue in that order) so he knew it wasn't a plane. He heard a sound like a cat that was purring at a low frequency (continuously vibrating) As the object passed over the witnesses vehicle, the engine just stopped as if someone had turned off the ignition. The Witness tried to use his cell phone but it wouldn't work despite the fact that he always keeps it charged. He also tried to roll down the electric car window but it wouldn't work either. He thought about getting out. He opened the door slightly but then reconsidered and closed the door. When he looked at the lights they seemed very bright but they didn't illuminate the ground; the witness said he can't explain this aspect as it doesn't make any sense to him. The craft appeared gun metal gray against the dark sky. After about 1.5 minutes the craft's lights blinked out and the witnesses vehicle started up without any action on the part of the witness. He put the car into drive and put the pedal down. All he wanted to do was find someone, find civilization. He was terrified! He didn't even look in his rearview mirror and says there is "no way I'm going to take that road again." Witness recalled running through several STOP signs on the way home. He said that he nearly crashed the car into a fence he was so scared. The witness stated that he actually doesn't want to even drive along that road again. 42 ► When he got home, he told his wife who said "well, maybe it was a plane" but the witn1ess knows that it wasn't a plane. His wife also suggested that he call the police but he didn't see what good that would do. Instead, he paced back and forth and drank a beer. He was so unnerved that he couldn't sleep for about two hours. He then goggled "how to report a UFO" and the first thing that came up was MUFON. He said that he wrote down exactly what remembered in his report. He wants to know what it is. Physiological (Medical) Effects: Witness reported that he had a toothache since his sighting but didn't notice any other physiological effects. He did not wish to be scanned for an implant. (investigator was prepared to conduct a magnetic scan) ~j Person Physical Effects - Investigator!...___!inspected the cell phone and found it to be working properly. Radiological Survey: Investigators checked the affected Vehicle for radiation, without any unusual readings (consistent with background) Investigators surveyed the site of the event (road side) and reading at the affected area were consistent with background reading. Electromagnetic- Electrostatic Effects: Investigators did find very significant abnormal readings on the subject vehicle with a tri-field meter. The witness was driving a 2009 Midsize 4 door sedan that was approximately 2 months old. Investigators conducted electro-static and electro-magnetic field tests on the Witnesses Vehicle (SUBJECT VEHICLE) and then went to a car dealer and selected an identical vehicle to the witnesses vehicle (TEST VEHICLE) same make model and year for comparison testing. Both the electro-static and electro-magnetic fields appear to have been dramatically affected. Specific meter reading (as to intensity) were not available, because the meter (pictured} pegged the needle in the proximity of the SUBJECT VEHICLE. See photos next page 43 SUBJECT VEHICLE - Driver's side rear engine compartment magnetic field reading. (Full intensity needle pegged) 44 TEST VEHICLE - Driver's side rear engine compartment magnetic field reading. 45 SUBJECT VEHICLE - Passenger's side rear engine compartment magnetic field reading. (Full intensity needle pegged) 46 .. . TEST VEHICLE - Passenger's side rear engine compartment magnetic field reading I--. Note: The witness said that it seems like the car is actually driving faster now...almost as if he got a free tune up. AAP Person Note: for unknown reasons, it appears that at some point during the 103 ., ,...... -·•- .... investitfaUon; ·--- .- ikon 0700 battery failed and the backup battery also ~i P:r.~?.n. .Jail.ed. -- · · recalls, however, that at all areas which he checked on the witness' vehicle, the EMF meter remained at maximum reading as long as the meter was ~: P~~5.?.~ _withJn3_.inches-of..t-he.-Wi~sses' car-:-1- Ihas no explanation for the camera's multiple battery failure. The batteries were charged beforehand and normally will take over 1000 phot os with GPS enabled. The first photos were taken at the site ~f P:~~?n _of.the .even.t.-{ ···-·- f hecked the camera's batteries after taking pictures at the AAP Person site of the event and a 94% charge remained.I =:J-t-hefl-r-e-t-t:trned-to-the-·-· 103·· witness' home to take photos of his two month old 2009 car. I --·---+to-Ok.over...ro,;~erson 47 - 100 photos of the witness' car. Only 12 photos documenting the magnetic testing ~: P:~:?_~---~-!1.d.110.ne_oJ_theEMEiesting..tur:neci--0Yt.!- !then tested the exact same car model in a car dealer's lot with a digital camera ("test vehicle.") Note: While we were with the witness, he had a telephone call which did not display a number and when he answered, there was no response on the other end. This has happened a couple of times since the event. The witness also states that his phone has been affecting his speakers since the incident and we ~: P:r.:0n hearda_strang.e._stati.csoun.ciou.r.seJves.--j- !checked the phone for electro magnetic and electro-static effects and found none. Summary: The investigators did not notice any major contradictions in witness testimony, nor did the witness appear to falter in any of the questions of detail. • Investigators found this witness to be highly credible. He was still visibly shaken from his encounter. • The witness denies any medical conditions or taking any medications that affect his ability to think or concentrate. • The investigators questioned for the possibility of lost time, without any indication of such, evident from the witness testimony. • This Investigation yields a reliance primarily on a single witness testimony of events. • Independent evidence was a electromagnetic and electrostatic effects on the effected vehicle as compared to test vehicle of identical make and model. 48 • Natural phenomenon was ruled out as a possibility because of the proximity to the witness, movement patterns, and contact/effects of the witness. • A radiological survey was conducted and readings in the affected area were consistent with the background readings in the unaffected control area. END REPORT 49 Case Report MUFON SIP Deployment Case # 20264-20123-20268 Case Type: Cat 2 Investigator: ... IM_P_P_e_ __ rs_on122_________ GPS COORDINATES: 1843(a)(3) COORDINATES ACCURACY: Within (51) feet of coordinates. 1. LOCATION: ********Tomball, Texas 2. LOCATION: •••••••*Tomball, Texas 3. LOCATION: 1-35 South Bound in Georgetown, Texas 1. DATE OF EVENT: November 01, 2009 Case 20264 2. DATE OF EVENT: October 25,2009 Case 20123 3. DATE OF EVENT: November 01,2009 Case 20268 1. TIME OF EVENT: 21:57 hrs ( x) Exact ( ) Approximate 2. TIME OF EVENT: 03:20 hrs. ( x) Exact ( ) Approximate 3. TIME OF EVENT: Unknown On November 02, 2009 a CAT 2 Star team Deployment In Tomball TX was authorized and investigator!MP Person 122 jwas assigned as lead investigator. I accompanied the investigator and videotaped the witness testimony. 50 IAAP Person 59 MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) STAR Team Manager SIP Project Coordinator • Background Case #1 Nineteen year old girl comes home and hears a loud sound and looks out in her back yard and sees a disk like object floating in her back ya rd. • Background Case #2 Forty seven year old female in bed heard loud nose passed over her house, looked her out window and saw nothing. • Background Case #3 Unknown submitter stated that they saw an object in a field while traveling south bound on 1-35 in Georgetown, Texas. Synopsis: November 2, 2009 this investigator received a deployment notification from IAAP Person 59 lin reference to female witness an object hovering in her back yard. In the report the witness stated that she had arrived home on November first around 21:57 hrs. Witness stated in her report that she was in the kitchen and heard a noise that kept getting loud. The witness then stated that she went to the back door and saw a saucer like object hovering about 20 feet in the air in her back yard. During this investigation this investigator learned that two other sighting reports had been reported to the CMS data base. These sighting reports are linked together because they be related. Giving their time frame and the information in 51 the witness statements they should be added to this report to support the witness statement. Investigator Narrative: AAP Person On November 02 2009 at 10:19 hrs this lnvestigato~ ---+recefve-a··a·------ • 122 deploy notice from SIP CoordinatorlAAP Person 59 Ito investigate a possible sighting at*******, Tomball, Harris County, Texas. At 11:20 hrs this Investigator contact the witness by public service and a meeting was setup for 13:00 hrs. At 13:15 hrs this Investigator met with the witness at her residence. This Investigator interviewed the witness to get a better i