Auto-extracted from the original scan with OCR · may contain extraction artifacts. The source document above is authoritative.
pproved for Release 202
Minin
i
sine [ "
. i
mn
8.
CONTROLLED DISS
peak in the lunar crater Alphonsus) has turned out to be correct, On
the other hand, it is really more accurate to say that this observation
-tronomers had been out in the countryside one evening and had seen a
the phenomenon. It is possible that some interest was » kindled that might
there was definitely an opportunity for additional research,
‘The general feeliug one | gets is that no offtet al treatment of the UFO
- work, principally Menzei's book, to demonstrate the absence of real
scientific problems. At the same time, there is an almost universal a
- awareness of the history and characteristics of the phenomenon often se
sociated with considerable interest, The reault is that a demonstration
of the inadequacy of US Official explanations coupled with some leew of
the reality of the observations might excite enthusiesm more idly =
; among soe: sscrengente ‘than emorg their us counterparts bso are more
: cu red
ae prereagediows |
experience of this effect. (Comment: Kozyrev is a controversial figure
in the Soviet scientific community as well as internationally, Appar-
ently one of his questionable observations (the activity of the central
led to an intensive search for activity on the Moon that has produced
some positive results, There may be no connection between the two sete
of data, however.)
At the Main Astronomical Observatory, Kiev, little interest is shown in
the UFO question. I.K. Koval mentioned that he and several other as-
curious, reddish object flashing through the sky that they were convinced
Was neither a satellite nor a meteorite, However, their immediate in-
terpretation was that this object might have been a fragment of a satel-
lite or rocket returning from orbit, burning up in the atmosphere. Koval
thought that UFO's had been seen in the USSR but he could not be specific
as to locations and characteristics.
At the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Crimea, again little intereat
was shown, One of the astronomers, L.I. Galkin, was with the group men-
tioned by Koval and confirmed the observation of a peculiar object. He
did not discuss the experience in detail but clearly had been struck by
the possibility that the object might have been a "saucer."
At the Astrophysical Institute, Alma Ata, there was considerabie interest.
The institute includes an Atmospheric Optics Section presided over by
G.S, Lifschitz. However, the initial discussion of the problem was with
the director of the institue, G.M. Idlis. He too had read Menzel's
book, but considered it an adequate treatment of the subject which he
consequently felt was closed. He indicated that no observations of UFO's
had been made by his etaff and that they had received no reports of such
observations. However, when the US scientist proceeded to indicate the
results of McDonald's critical study of the problem, Idlis readily con-
ceded that there might be more to it and concluded by stating that it
was "clearly still an open question."
Another astronomer mentioned that in ths northern part of Kazakhstan
there had been repeated sightings of ball lightning. The University in
Alma At. had sent a team out to investigate and discovered that what wa:
being seen were reflections of automobile headlights from an anvereton ee
layer.
Later, a discussion was held with Lifschitz. He was not very impressed
with Menzel's book, but was also not impressed with the significance of
lead to additional investigations,
A stellar spectroscopiet, Dr. yy Kupo, was also interested in this
problem, partly as an adjunct to her attempts to locate fragments from
bolides. Sha was elso dissatisfied with Menzel's book and felt that
problem has been given in the USSR, Instead people refer to the US
Context
This is one of 21 CIA records in the declassified archive, reported in the Other region. It was published in Release 03 (6/12).
Evidence tiers describe the type of record (sensor capture vs. written report vs.
administrative file) · not a claim about its conclusions. UFO Papers reports only what the documents state.